Who would know better about libelous/defamatory attacks and lawsuits
then you Mr. Mark Robert Thorson!
The lawsuit was dismissed by plaintiff Belfort and Kukucka didn't have
to print a formal retraction like you did (Mark Robert Thorson) when
Cell Tech sued your defamatory lying ass for libel and you lost the
case. How much did it cost you Mr. Mark Robert Thorson? There was
absolutely no basis, truth or credence to plaintiff Belfort's wild
allegations regarding Kukucka.... you obviously didn't read the court
file! BTW: Don't you still owe attorney fees to someone Mark Robert
Thorson: http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/s****-oil.htm
What you (Mark Robert Thorson) neglected to re****t was that Plaintiff
Belfort sued Kukucka in retaliation as defendant Kukucka filed
whistleblower case(s) with several federal agencies including the FAA
IG's office regarding criminal wrongdoing by Belfort Instrument
Company (specifically fraud against shareholders under SOX 2002 and
offering gratuities & other gifts to federal employees while seeking
federal
approvals/contracts).
Make sure you get it right Mr. Mark Robert Thorson and STOP
propagating LIES!
http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Misc/misc.health.alternative/2005-12/msg00142.html
notes the following about Mr. Mark Robert Thorson Thorson:
Mark Robert Thorson LIED AGAIN and wrote:
> "Nothing I said about the algae was a lie or false."
When in fact, one individual, namely Mark Robert Thorson was
responsible for a great deal of miscommunication regarding anatoxin-a,
information which is still accessible on many Internet sites. Cell
Tech sued Mark Robert Thorson for posting defamatory statements about
Cell Tech, its products and its personnel to various
Internet or Usenet news groups. Cell Tech's lawsuit against Mr. Mark
Robert Thorson has now been settled and included a settlement
agreement.
Here's Luny Mark Robert Thorson's penned public retraction after he
lost his
case:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.nutrition/msg/3f44b3e07f6a3bb6
Dictionary definitions for the benefit of Mark Thorson:
Mis-state - to state incorrectly : give a false account of
False - intentionally untrue
Lie - untrue with intent to deceive
n.b. Mark Thorson's name and reputation is synonymous with "to mis-
state, false and to lie." He cannot be relied upon and has zero
credibility in this matter!
Additional factual info about this SLUG can be found at:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.arch/msg/4bc6224b7bbc0219
And look at this goldmine: What is currently known about Mark
Thorson:
His current email address is eee@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
which traces to
e...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
traces to mmm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
traces to his middle name: robert
http://cypherpunks.venona.com/date/1992/11/msg00295.html
Mark Robert Thorson is near-sighted and wears gl*****s
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro/msg/7ce1003715ba45cb
Using another public database, I found:
1) Mark R. Thorson (DOB: August 1958) 12991 PIERCE RD, SARATOGA, CA
95070
http://www.google.com/maphp?hl=en&tab=wl&q=12991%20PIERCE%20RD,%20SAR...
2) Mark R. Thorson (DOB: March 1959), 19348 VIA CUESTA, RAMONA, CA
92065
http://www.google.com/maphp?hl=en&tab=wl&q=19348%20VIA%20CUESTA,%20RA...
3) Mark R. Thorson, 11579 WAY BOX ELDER, SAN DIEGO, CA 92127
http://www.google.com/maphp?hl=en&tab=wl&q=11579%20WAY%20BOX%20ELDER,...
Given his history, I believe that #1 listed above is Mark Robert
Thorson's likely Taliban hideout since it is close to San Jose, CA as
the other two locations are near San Diego, CA.
Other tidbits about LOWLIFE Mark Robert Thorson:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.arch/msg/4bc6224b7bbc0219
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/4bc6224b7b...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/61e7bb4327df583c
n.b. Hey Mark Robert Thorson, are you still stupid enough to be
looking directly at the sun thru a peephole? What other peepholes are
you peering thru anyway?
|
