A new classification method for RNGs: Significance Level

My experiments show that the random number generator
in Microsoft's VC++6 compiler is a statistical RNG with a
significance level > 1.0%.
Statistical testing at SL >1.0% (for example 1.001%) p***** the test,
but 1.0% does not pass...

Can anybody confirm this finding?

The RNG function of the various SW products can be 
analyzed and classified better using its significance level 
as shown above.
I think this IMO im****tant finding deserves a deeper research... :-)

For the testing method see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_test
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_distribution