Talk About Network

Google





Science > Biomedical engineering > Re: Req: Schem...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 381 of 446
Post > Topic >>

Re: Req: Schematic for BASIC electromyogram (EMG) - biofeedback type device - Attn Frank

by <Joe@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 3, 2007 at 04:40 AM

Thanks for your valid concern.  I'm guessing a couple of 9 volt batteries
would be plenty adequate for the circuit, safe enough at my thumb given
worst-case, and last a reasonably long time at 4 fifteen minute sessions as
day.
I'd have sworn I had a schematic for something along these lines in my
files, but can't lay my hand on it.
I've got electrodes, op amps, precision resistors and caps, breadboards,
and wire.
Heck, I thought a schematic for something like this was in everybody's
pocket, and the assembly would be the challenge.
Getting the insurance company to fund a commercial one is looking easier
all the time.
Thanks for the thought.

Path:
beO3!out03a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in04.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in02.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!postnews.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news.alt.net!news.u.wa****ngton.edu!fpm
From: fpm@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Frank Miles)
Newsgroups: sci.engr.biomed
Subject: Re: Req:  Schematic for BASIC electromyogram (EMG) - biofeedback
type device
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:41:55 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: University of Wa****ngton
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <eq00lj$qvj$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
References: <kxqwh.17361$%N3.16996@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mead12.u.wa****ngton.edu
X-Trace: gnus01.u.wa****ngton.edu 1170441715 27635 140.142.12.176 (2 Feb
2007 18:41:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: help@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:41:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)
Xref: usenetserver.com sci.engr.biomed:114109
X-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 13:41:55 EST (beO3)

In article <kxqwh.17361$%N3.16996@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 <Joe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>Seems that it could be done with a handful of off-the-shelf parts.  From
browsing the group, I've seen where these are often class projects.
>
>Purpose - Determine specific muscle maximum output.  
>Input- Standard skin electrodes.  
>Output - LEDs preferred over sound.
>Requirement - no programmable chips.
>Application - I severed the median and ulnar nerves (and a bunch of other
stuff) just above the elbow.  After a couple surgeries, I've gained some
motion in my thumb, and I'm trying to exerecise it to the max muscle
activity level.
>I've used a commercial unit in the Occupational Therapy clinic, but it
has a fancy LCD display with mmv readings, timers, etc. that I don't need. 

>I visualize an output of a simple string of LEDs.  If I remember
correctly, the commercial unit displayed readings of 10 to 60 mmv,
depending on pad placement and fatigue level.  With luck, this will
increase, but I don't know what normal limits are, and don't expect to get
anywhere near normal levels.  Changing ranges would be a nifty.
>
>Seems it could be done with a power supply,  amplifier, and LED driver
chip, or maybe easier.  I've got a well stocked junk box.
>Any suggestions?

I've designed such devices, but I have to say - you want to be very
careful
in hooking yourself (however indirectly) to the power line.  Especially
when you talk about getting your parts from a "junk box".

I'd recommend that you keep power demands low enough that you can run on
a smallish battery.

Good luck!

	-f
-- 


**********End Of Post*************
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: Req: Schematic for BASIC electromyogram (EMG) - biofeedback
<Joe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-03 04:40:43 
Re: Req: Schematic for BASIC electromyogram (EMG) - biofeedback
"Florence Craye"  2007-02-03 20:09:50 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 0:13:38 PST 2009.