Talk About Network

Google





Science > Engr Radar+sonar > matched filter ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 281 of 323
Post > Topic >>

matched filter phase

by "rutiger" <rutiger_bishop@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 3, 2006 at 09:10 AM

Has it just been too long since I have looked closely at an actual
phase equation or should there be a quadratic phase on the output of an
LFM matched filter? I know the problem is often worked out in the
frequency domain, but it seems straight forward enough to just carry
out the integration by hand. If alpha is the frequency slope, t is
time, t_tgt round trip delay,  and t_0 some reference time, the output
of the mathced filter of n LFM signal is (leaving off the limits for
clarity):

s(t) = integral { exp( j*pi*alpha * ( x - t_tgt )^2 ) * exp(
-j*pi*alpha * ( x - t_0 - t )^2 ) dx }

If I just do the algebra, the phase of this signal is

phase = pi*aplha * ( x^2 + t_tgt^2 - 2*x*t_tgt - x^2 - t_0^2 - t^2 +
2*x*t_0 + 2*x*t - 2*t_0*t_tgt )

The two x^2 terms cancel out, the t_0^2 and t_tgt^2 terms are the RVP,
and the linear terms that stay inside the integral (those that are a
function of x) define the sinc() function that one expects coming out
of the matched filter. My confusion is the t^2 term. He is not a
function of x, so he comes out of the integral and there is nobody to
cancel him out. But that means that the output is a sinc() function
with quadratic phase and I always remembered that the output is a sinc
function with linear phase.

Can anybody help with where I am going wrong?
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
matched filter phase
"rutiger" <r  2006-07-03 09:10:58 
Re: matched filter phase
"rutiger" <r  2006-07-06 13:00:24 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 18:39:39 PST 2009.