I may end up in the second editions as to a title that allows me to go
back and forth between
these two books, more easily. Trouble is that I am now caught in a
bind as to which topic
belongs more in one book rather than the other. Perhaps the titles
should be:
(1) Photons & Neutrinos contain "perfect DNA"; biology side
(2) Photons & Neutrinos contain "perfect DNA"; physics side
So that if a topic seems to be more physics than biology, I include it
in the physics trio book
and vice versa.
But the topic of today is a fundamental and im****tant topic of physics
and ironic that in the
past decades of my Internet science writings I have been very unkind
to biologists who
make up definitions when definitions are not needed and to push these
definitions around
as if they are doing actual science when in fact they are merely
creating vocabulary, and
meaningless and hollow vocabulary. Pick up most biology books or
recent print and you
will end up with mostly hollow and meaningless vocabulary masquerading
as ideas
of biology when in fact they are simply nonscience.
Now one is surprized that physics can be as hollow and shallow and
meaningless as so many
biology and psychology and sociology books where this "vocabulary
creation" ends up as being
offered as real science when it is nonscience. But here is a prime
example of nonscience in
physics:
Messenger particle
Exchange particle
Force Carrier
Interaction Coupling
Vector Boson
Gauge Boson
Intermediate Vector Boson
Mediating Weak Interactions
Mediating Electromagnetic Interactions
Mediating Strong Nuclear Force
Trouble with that so called physics of vocabulary is that it sounds as
if the physicists who
use that language, meant to say more about the particle. Meant to say
more as to what it
"messages" or what it "carries" or what it "exchanges", but however,
the physicists who use
those terms are so much in the dark and ignorance that they can only
use the terms and
never get down to true reality of what it messages or carries or
exchanges.
And part of the trouble of physics of the past on this topic is that
the entire topic is built on
an analogy. The analogy is the two Tennis players where they keep
hitting a tennis ball back
and forth and they are the proton and electron and the tennis ball is
the Exchange or Messenger
or Carrier Particle.
Funny, how a huge part of modern physics is based on a crude analogy
of a s****ts game,
and a s****ts game which I really do not care much about.
This trilogy set of books is going to change all of that, for the DNA
particle in biology is going
to elaborate and enhance and expand and discuss in depth of what a
Carrier Particle or
Messenger Particle or Exchange Particle is in both biology and in
physics.
Ironic that I carped and beefed about the sad condition of biology and
biology related sciences
in the 1990s decade as a game wherein professors spend more time in
making up vocabulary
words that were hollow of reality and meaning and called it science.
Ironic that here and now
I am replacing this Vocabulary shell game used in physics for particle-
physics with a true
science used in biology.
So, yes, I am going to dispel the Tennis analogy out of physics and
replace it with real science.
No-one can doubt that DNA is a messenger particle, a force-carrier
particle, a mediating particle
or an Exchange Particle.
Now, what does the photon say to the proton when it meets? What does
the photon do
when it meets the proton and then what does the proton do to the
photon that it then goes
back to the electron? And what does the photon do to the electron when
they meet? So questions
like this were never allowed to be asked before in physics. Never
allowed because physicists
had only reached a level of intelligence on this topic of a hollow
vocabulary shell game level
of physics. But now physicists have a floodgate of new ideas and
questions on this topic
because now we have the idea that a photon carries inside itself
"perfect DNA" and within
perfect DNA is RNA and Messenger-RNA. So that when a photon meets a
proton, the proton
interacts more than slapping back and forth some tennis ball.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
|
