Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science > Electromagnetics > Re: Relativisti...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 10 Topic 2922 of 3231
Post > Topic >>

Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction

by "t-online.de" <DGrosch@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 7, 2008 at 05:59 PM

"Tom Roberts" <tjroberts137@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>> Modern physicists might have been "dazzled" by the "brilliance" of
>> Einstein, a "genius" who toppled Galileo, dethroned Newton and
>> overturned natural sense.
>
> Not true. Physicists seek theories that correspond to the real world in 
> larger and larger domains. Relativity does that, and theories of Galileo

> and Newton do not. While Einstein was indeed a genius, it is the scope
and 
> quality of his THEORIES that matters.
>
 This assertion is false
Einstein's genius only consisted with which in indicating a mathematical 
formula all experimental results on the condition c = constantly one can 
transform. He wants to prove the world with that that the assertion is
also 
writeable. However, mur is a mathematical problem and this does not have
to 
do with a physical reality. He has demonstrated only something to the
world.
>> It is high time we abandon the wilderness of relativity and revert
>> back to Galileo, Newton, Coulomb and Maxwell and start from the basic
>> principles.
>
> Nonsense. To do that is to abandon SCIENCE ITSELF, which is hopeless.
And 
> relativity is not a "wilderness", except to fools who do not understand
it 
> but still attempt to write about physics.
>
False! Unless for fools who do not want to accept the dependence of c of
the 
field strength of the electromagnetic field
These principles are in my dynamic gravitation theory on my home page, 
described beginnings into which
Dieter Grosch   www.grosch.homepage.t online; de
 




 10 Posts in Topic:
Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
musada <musadab@[EMAIL  2008-06-06 16:02:14 
Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@[E  2008-06-06 16:40:16 
Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
Pentcho Valev <pvalev@  2008-06-06 16:48:30 
Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
Pentcho Valev <pvalev@  2008-06-06 16:55:04 
Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
Tom Roberts <tjroberts  2008-06-07 04:00:58 
Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
"t-online.de" &  2008-06-07 17:59:30 
Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
"t-online.de" &  2008-06-08 06:57:15 
Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
Pentcho Valev <pvalev@  2008-06-07 12:30:50 
Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
The TimeLord <math-n-p  2008-07-11 20:40:35 
Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
"Autymn D. C."   2008-07-13 17:04:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Nov 20 13:10:56 CST 2008.