Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science > Electromagnetics > Re: Relativisti...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 10 Topic 2922 of 3231
Post > Topic >>

Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction

by "t-online.de" <DGrosch@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 8, 2008 at 06:57 AM

"t-online.de" <DGrosch@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> schrieb im Newsbeitrag 
news:g2eb8o$rk5$03$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Tom Roberts" <tjroberts137@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>>> Modern physicists might have been "dazzled" by the "brilliance" of
>>> Einstein, a "genius" who toppled Galileo, dethroned Newton and
>>> overturned natural sense.
>>
>> Not true. Physicists seek theories that correspond to the real world in

>> larger and larger domains. Relativity does that, and theories of
Galileo 
>> and Newton do not. While Einstein was indeed a genius, it is the scope 
>> and quality of his THEORIES that matters.
>>
> This assertion is false
> Einstein's genius only consisted with which in indicating a mathematical

> formula all experimental results on the condition c = constantly one can

> transform. He wants to prove the world with that that the assertion is 
> also writeable. However, mur is a mathematical problem and this does not

> have to do with a physical reality. He has demonstrated only something
to 
> the world.
>>> It is high time we abandon the wilderness of relativity and revert
>>> back to Galileo, Newton, Coulomb and Maxwell and start from the basic
>>> principles.
>>
>> Nonsense. To do that is to abandon SCIENCE ITSELF, which is hopeless.
And 
>> relativity is not a "wilderness", except to fools who do not understand

>> it but still attempt to write about physics.
>>
> False! Unless for fools who do not want to accept the dependence of c of

> the field strength of the electromagnetic field
> These principles are in my dynamic gravitation theory on my home page, 
> described beginnings into which
> Dieter Grosch   www.grosch.homepage.t-online.de
>
>
 




 10 Posts in Topic:
Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
musada <musadab@[EMAIL  2008-06-06 16:02:14 
Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@[E  2008-06-06 16:40:16 
Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
Pentcho Valev <pvalev@  2008-06-06 16:48:30 
Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
Pentcho Valev <pvalev@  2008-06-06 16:55:04 
Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
Tom Roberts <tjroberts  2008-06-07 04:00:58 
Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
"t-online.de" &  2008-06-07 17:59:30 
Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
"t-online.de" &  2008-06-08 06:57:15 
Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
Pentcho Valev <pvalev@  2008-06-07 12:30:50 
Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
The TimeLord <math-n-p  2008-07-11 20:40:35 
Re: Relativistic Mass Expansion and Length Contraction
"Autymn D. C."   2008-07-13 17:04:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Nov 20 12:04:05 CST 2008.