Re: Expelled: If you don't believe in holy physics dogma ; you're

On Jun 18, 9:15=A0pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Benj wrote:
> [snip 68 lines of crap]

Al, you forgot to mention "tinfoil hat"!

> =A0 =A01) Name one empirical failure of physical science.

Physical science is FILLED with "empircal failures"!  And the problem
is not failure, but refusal to OPENLY DISCUSS those failures! The so-
called "theory of evolution" is FILLED with questions, but you high
priests do NOT permit any discussion of them. You bear false witness
by asserting that the theory is infallible.  Clearly this is some kind
of religious dogma and NOT a scientific attitude!

How many "empirical failures" of physical science have there been? How
much time do you have?  Heavier than air craft can't fly! You can't
build a motor without a commutator. Disease is caused by "bad humours"
that must be drained out. The geological "theory of uniformity", sun
goes around the earth .... and on and on.

But the whole point here is NOT "wrong" theories, but a POLITICAL
effort to eliminate any and all open discussion of theories not
considered open to questioning by the establishment.  Are we talking
about SCIENCE here or the "infallibility" of the pope?

> =A0 =A02) Idiot.
>
> (physical reality) - (empirical reality) =3D faith

(Empirical reality) - (free and open discussion of it) =3D religious
dogma

Moron.

> Faith is destroyed if it works. =A0If you have faith you can only be
> denied. =A0Test of faith! =A0What can be asserted without evidence can
> also be dismissed without evidence.

Dear most ignorant uncle Al.  We are NOT talking here about replacing
empirical evidence with faith! Come on admit it! Like all "debunkers"
you are arguing against the do***entary and you haven't even seen it,
have you?  We are talking about so-called "establishment science"
DEMANDING that various conclusions be accepted as "faith" while any
discussion of empiricism that creates doubt is systematically
suppressed by political means! Remind you of any organizations? Maybe
a little taste of the stake will give you a reminder!

Oddly enough uncle Al, it is YOU who is arguing FOR faith-based
science here and tis I (and Ben Stein) who are arguing for
empiricism!

Come on Al. I KNOW you are NOT this Stupid! Therefore this can only
mean you must have some kind of political agenda!
Fess up! You are really just one more closet leftist, right?