On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 10:24:05 -0500, Bert Hickman
<bert_hickman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>John C. Polasek wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 06:00:07 -0700 (PDT), khrapko_ri@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Electrodynamics' spin tensor, apparently, exists. I can be wrong. That
>>> happened to me before. However, see my paper "Mechanical stresses
>>> produced by a light beam", Journal of Modern Optics vol. 55, no. 9,
>>> pp. 1487-1500 (2008).
>>> Also you can get it at www.sciprint.org, Preprint archives, Search
>>> For: author, Text: Khrapko.
>>>
>>> The fact of the matter is we are in big trouble. An inclusion of the
>>> spin tensor in the Maxwell electrodynamics will entail rewriting of
>>> all textbooks on the classical field theory. Please see my posts:
>>> "Electrodynamics' spin tensor is a test of professionalism and
>>> honesty," "Silence of the physicists. 2," "Silence of the physicists"
>>>
>>> Radi Khrapko
>> You need to elaborate more on how to see your paper. I get 0's for
>> your name as a search item. I see only one search box, put in your
>> name, and get 5 0's as the result.
>> Do you have to join the organization? Even the box where you register
>> doesn't work.
>
>Try:
>http://www.podtime.net/sciprint/fm/index.php?action=category&id=36
>
>Bert
Thanks. It's too much for me. With every click another
incomprehensible comment or command. Try to download, select one of
the sites (none given).
|
