Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> If the Schrodinger Equation cannot handle it, then what in Physics can
> handle Gravity =
> Positron Space.
>
> The answer, I believe at this moment, may surprize most people, for it
> surprizes me
> somewhat. The answer is that Schrodinger Equation, although powerful,
> is not really as
> powerful as the Maxwell Equations.
>
> So I am going to have to write a book on the "Lowest Terms of
> Physics". Recently I said I
> had to write a book on the lowest-terms of economics, political
> science, biology, and chemistry
> but I said that physics needs no lowest-term book since it encomp*****
> all the sciences.
> Now I see I have to write a Lowest Terms of Physics book. Others would
> call them Foundation books
> as the Foundation of Physics or the Foundations of Economics. But I
> like the name
> Lowest-Terms for it signifies so much more than the term "foundation"
> since old science has
> inflated the word "foundation" and so inflated that it has become
> meaningless.
>
snipped
>
> For the book "Lowest Terms of Physics" I envision three things that
> make up physics:
> (1) Periodic Chart of Elements: something to work with and work on
> (2) Maxwell Equations: the worker on the elements
> (3) Schrodinger or Dirac Equation: description of an Element
>
> I am on vacation and will dive into this after August.
>
snipped
So I think I got the lowest terms of physics in those three
categories.
I have what constitutes the Universe as one big atom containing
nothing but other
atoms. And the Maxwell Equations describe all the forces of atoms
interacting
with one another. And finally the Schrodinger Equation as a
description of a particular
atom.
So I have physics wrapped up. Physics is atoms and the forces of atoms
are the
Maxwell Equation since all the forces unify as a Coulomb force.
This should be a short book, a monograph book.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
|
