On Jun 24, 2:06=A0pm, plutonium.archime...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I feel like as if I am in a auto accident of a multicollision event.
> Only the event is a new idea
> which causes me to have to write several books on that new idea and
> for which it changes
> old books that relate to that new idea.
>
> The whole rationale for my vacation is to organize the books already
> published on Internet
> but this new idea is causing a traffic collision.
>
> Oh, well, one principle of work I have always maintained is "let the
> new ideas flow and
> take precedence over all else." I can always clean up and organize
> later.
>
>
>
>
>
> =A0Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>
> > Maxwell added the Displacement Current to the Ampere Law because he
> > wanted
> > to preserve light as a transverse wave travelling at the speed of
> > light. Ampere's law
> > without this added term would decrease the speed of light and no
> > longer a transverse
> > wave.
>
> > What I am focusing upon is the idea that Gravity =3D Positron Space
and
> > where tidal forces
> > cause the Positron Space to emit antimatter which subsequently
> > annihilates with surrounding
> > ordinary matter and emitting gamma radiation.
>
> > So can this Displacement Current be 10^40 smaller than the Ampere
> > component in the
> > Maxwell Equations. I know the Displacement Current is terribly small
> > be can it be
> > 10^40 smaller?
>
> I believe what has happened with the Ampere-Maxwell Law is that the
> Displacement Current
> becomes dependent on the Ampere component, where the two components
> march in lock
> step dependency. And that the Ampere component can reach a minimum and
> go no further.
> Some Planck constant minimum. As the Ampere component reaches that
> minimum, then
> the Displacement Current must also be at a Minimum and the relative
> force strengths between
> the Ampere component and the Displacement Current is a difference of
> 10^40, which is the
> same number found as the coupling force strength difference between
> Coulomb and gravity
> forces.
>
> But I would need mathematicians and physicists to confirm this.
>
> Archimedes Plutoniumwww.iw.net/~a_plutonium
> whole entire Universe is just one big atom
> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Just for the benefit of newcomers to Usenet, Archimeded Plutonium is a
harmless sort guy, but someone who has been his pseudo-scientific
crapolla on the newsgroup for now very close to 20 years.
Now for the newcomers, Archie has become somwhat of an enigma on the
Internet, because no one actually knows who he is. As far back as I
can remember, Archie claim his occupation as being a dishwasher at the
student cafeteria at http://www.dartmouth.edu/
NH. Still nobody really
belives this tale tale.
While I hate to reveal this, but I've been told by trusted sources
that Archie Pu is simply a student recreation thing, produced by
students at Dartmouth. The author of thse posts simply is not a real
person and doesn't exist.
Now Dartmouth is no educational slouch, and my second choice to MIT to
send my chilren, but since they have all graduated from their colleges
of their coice, that is no longer an issue.
Harry C.
|
