Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science > Electromagnetics > Re: Electric ge...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 6 of 6 Topic 2941 of 3231
Post > Topic >>

Re: Electric generator

by John C. Polasek <jpolasek@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 25, 2008 at 11:02 AM

On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:34:22 -0700 (PDT), Peter <Poakfield@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>On Jun 25, 1:34 am, "Don Kelly" <d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> .
>> ----------------------------"Peter" <Poakfi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message
>>
>>
news:c52fae08-023f-4eaa-bf82-1df097e63ae2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Jun 24, 1:33 am, "Don Kelly" <d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > ----------------------------"Peter" <Poakfi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message
>>
>>
>news:346cd631-7159-497e-a7aa-834fda352c9b@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > > Hi! Can someone please help me? I understand the force in an
electric
>> > > generator is F = B (q x v). Is the work done on the generator equal
to
>> > > W = B(q x v) (vt), where vt is the distance the electrons in the
wire
>> > > move because of the rotation of the rotor? If the angular velocity
of
>> > > the rotor is doubled, does the work done on the generator increase
>> > > four times, because it would then be W = B (q x 2v) (2vt); thus the
>> > > energy produced by the generator also increases four times? Thank.
>> > > Please excuse me if I am saying dumb things. I may be missing
>> > > something. I am trying to learn. Thanks.
>>
>> > No. Note that force is q(v x B) not B (q x v) There is a difference.
The x
>> > is not a multiplication but a vector cross product. B and v are
vectors
>> > while q is a scalar (-ve for electrons).
>>
>> > It is easier to consider the case of a conductor of length l which is
at
>> > right angles to the field and to the motion- then this is simplified.
>> > Then there is a force acting on the conductor of F=Bli where i is the
>> > current (qv) and acting in a direction to oppose the motion - at
right
>> > angles to the current.
>> > You can start from the same basis or use Faraday to determine the
voltage
>> > V=Blv
>> > The power of the generator will be Vi which can be expressed as Fv
and the
>> > work in a given time will be the integral of this.
>> > If you double the velocity, you will double the voltage but the
current
>> > will depend on what is connected to the terminals of the generator.
If
>> > open or short circuited, the work will be 0.
>> > In between with some load there will be some power.
>>
>> > In the case of a fixed resistance load, doubling the speed, doubles
the
>> > voltage and so quadruples the power (and energy in a given time). You
are
>> > right with respect to that although your approach is not correct.
>>
>> > Don Kelly d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > remove the X to answer
>>
>> Thank you. That helped a lot. Then, is it correct if I say the
>> instantaneous work done is W = q(v x B)(vt), where vt is the distance
>> and t is the time? (This is in analogy to W = force x distance.)
>> ----------------------------------------
>> No. Note that the force is perpendicular to the velocity -not in the
>> direction of the velocity-not co-linear as in the mechanical analogy.
>>
>> Don Kelly d...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> remove the X to answer- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Thanks. Then, what would be the work done in terms of B, q, v, and t?
Peter, you would do yourself a favor if you didn't try to coerce the
Lorentz force as an explanation of the dynamics of a motor or
generator. Lorentz force is no factor, if only because the force is
normal to the motion. 
Secondly, q x v, charge times velocity is not a current; you would
need charge per unit length times velocity to make a current. And you
need to deal in currents. 
Study up on Lentz' law and other elementary concepts; the Lorentz
force is in a separate exotic class.
John Polasek
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
Electric generator
Peter <Poakfield@[EMAI  2008-06-23 17:25:50 
Re: Electric generator
"Don Kelly" <  2008-06-24 05:33:22 
Re: Electric generator
Peter <Poakfield@[EMAI  2008-06-24 07:36:39 
Re: Electric generator
"Don Kelly" <  2008-06-25 05:34:18 
Re: Electric generator
Peter <Poakfield@[EMAI  2008-06-25 04:34:22 
Re: Electric generator
John C. Polasek <jpola  2008-06-25 11:02:45 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 2:16:26 CST 2008.