Re: Expelled: If you don't believe in holy physics dogma ; you're fired!

On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:32:46 GMT, "Bill Miller"
<billmillerkt4ye@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>
>"Timo A. Nieminen" <timo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:Pine.WNT.4.64.0806240535450.1160@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Bill Miller wrote:
>>
>>>
>
>That leaves hordes of non PG students still believing this rubbish. And
it 
>begs the question of why, in UG cl*****, the instructors don't say 
>*something* about how theses two parameters don't cause each other, but
that 
>they always appear simultaneously. I suspect its because the instructors 
>don't know it!

I fervently hope you're not teaching anyone. You're too ignorant to be
in the business of physics which is that of discerning cause and
effect. Instead of denying cause and effect, you should be analyzing
for the underlying science. 
>
>Is there a single UG EM textbook that correctly categorizes the
relation****p 
>between E and H? Even ONE?

Tell us, omniscient one, what exactly what is this precious
relation****p, of which you are evidently the exclusive franchisee?

Here's how I think it works: Volts applied to a coil build up H
ampturns/meter which when multiplied by mu store momentum B in
webers/m^2. Upon opening the circuit, momentum B divided by mu
generates a sizeable voltage back at the original terminals. The field
B is successively the sink and the source. Yes V causes B and B causes
V.

>Cheers, Bill 

John Polasek