Re: Expelled: If you don't believe in holy physics dogma ; you're

On 26 Jun, 03:25, John C. Polasek <jpola...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:32:46 GMT, "Bill Miller"
>
> <billmillerkt...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >"Timo A. Nieminen" <t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >news:Pine.WNT.4.64.0806240535450.1160@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Bill Miller wrote:
>
> >That leaves hordes of non PG students still believing this rubbish. And
it
> >begs the question of why, in UG cl*****, the instructors don't say
> >*something* about how theses two parameters don't cause each other, but
that
> >they always appear simultaneously. I suspect its because the
instructors
> >don't know it!
>
> I fervently hope you're not teaching anyone. You're too ignorant to be
> in the business of physics which is that of discerning cause and
> effect. Instead of denying cause and effect, you should be analyzing
> for the underlying science.
>
>
>
> >Is there a single UG EM textbook that correctly categorizes the
relation****p
> >between E and H? Even ONE?
>
> Tell us, omniscient one, what exactly what is this precious
> relation****p, of which you are evidently the exclusive franchisee?
>
> Here's how I think it works: Volts applied to a coil build up H
> ampturns/meter which when multiplied by mu store momentum B in
> webers/m^2. Upon opening the circuit, momentum B divided by mu
> generates a sizeable voltage back at the original terminals. The field
> B is successively the sink and the source. Yes V causes B and B causes
> V.
>
> >Cheers, Bill
>
> John Polasek

A charge is the source of E and H which are orthogonal and propagate
independently from it as given by the Lienard-Wiechert field
equations. I think that's all Bill is saying which isn't wrong, is it?