On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 10:18:28 -0700 (PDT), "tnlockyer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
<tnlockyer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Jun 28, 6:50?pm, John C. Polasek <jpola...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:52:40 -0700 (PDT), "tnlock...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
>>
>>
>>
>> <tnlock...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >On Jun 27, 4:32?am, frank_k_shel...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>> >> The fine structure constant alpha is said to be running
>> >> with energy as (from various QED textbooks)
>>
>> snip
>> >Frank, the fine structure constant is, by definition, the
>> >dimensionless ratio between the electron's electrical potential energy
>> >and rest mass energy. ? It is unlikely that alpha could "run" with
>> >energy because it is set by the geometry of ?the electron.
>
>Frank says;
>> It might be instructive if you stated the two quantities whose ratio
>> is alpha. I have alpha = e^2/2hceps0 but can't see your ratio there.
>>
>
>Your equation is in obselete cgs units, Frank.
>
>The International MetricSystem (SI) is the modern language of science,
>and I find it more intuitive.
>
>See the following link I gave you, Figure 4, left panel bottom
>calculation.
>
>The fine structure constant can be derived from a number of different
>math equations but all are traceable to the geometry, as demonstrated
>by the derivation shown.
>
>Alpha= (Flux x 2 x e)/ h
>
>>snip<
>
>> >I think you are on the right path in looking for some correction to
>> >the measurement methods. ?The running of their measurement has to be
>> >an artifact of their measurement methods.
>>
>> >See; ? ?http://members.aol.com/tnlockyer/CHARGESPIN.pdf
>>
>> >Hope the link works,
>>
>> >Regards, Tom- -
>
>P.S. See; www.amazon.com 096315463X for more information.
The link doesnt work.
John Polasek
|
