Re: Expelled: If you don't believe in holy physics dogma ; you're fired!

On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:26:05 -0700 (PDT), maxwell <spsi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>On Jun 29, 8:55 pm, John C. Polasek <jpola...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:28:07 -0700 (PDT), maxwell <s...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Jun 27, 9:21 am, John C. Polasek <jpola...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> ...
snip
>>

>> John Polasek
>
>Your attempt to build an EM theory around Maxwell's Displacement
>Current will run into the same problems that Clerk-Maxwell did - there
>is no such thing in the nothingness of the empty space between two
>electrons.  This was all an analogy with polarizable real material
>consisting of real positive & negatively charged matter.

I am not trying to build an EM theory around Maxwell's Displacement
Current on the fly. I have analyzed for a mechanism to explain
vacuum's permittivity  which you can see in excruciating detail as the
permittivity paper at http://www.dualspace.net.

The pairspace described has coefficients that define permittivity as
	eps0 = e^2/Lmc^2 = 8.8e-12 (sec^4*Amp^2/kg*m^3) which
translates to Coulomb/volt*meter = farad/m (mathcad translates this)
where L is the cell size = Compton WL x alpha= 3.54e-14m
or as
	eps0 = rho*e/K
where K = 2.6e14N/m   and rho = e/L^3
The compliance of permittivityis pro****tional to electron charge,
electron density and inverse to its spring coefficient K. 
This pairspace is a dual space to our empty universe. It's where
gravity resides also.
John Polasek