Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science > Electromagnetics > Re: Running of ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 17 of 19 Topic 2951 of 3231
Post > Topic >>

Re: Running of the fine structure constant - how exactly?

by Rock Brentwood <markwh04@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 2, 2008 at 12:33 AM

On Jun 30, 9:55=A0pm, Jay Bala <jay1b...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> alpha=3D7.29 735 257 240 051 31... x10^-3
> 1/alpha=3D137.035 999 025 471 68...

That's the low energy asymptotic value. As you ramp up the energy in a
scattering process and probe deeper into the field of a source, the
effective value of alpha increases. This occurs because the source
being probed by a scatting process actually deviates from Coulomb, as
you probe deeper into it. For electromagnetism, the effective
potential goes faster than 1/r, though it's 1/r when far-removed from
the source. There's a huge industry that is (and has long been around)
dedicated to the question of the inverse scattering problem
(reconstructing an image, here, the profile of the potential
surrounding a source, from the results of scattering done off the
source). One actually sees the effective alpha go up at high energies.

It's widely believed (but not a complete consensus) that theory
predicts, in fact, that it would approach infinity at a finite
positive radius. That's called the Landau Pole.

To some extent this may be classically modelled. On general
principles, one would expect an effective dynamics for the dielectric
coefficient epsilon to be given by an equation of the form
   [] log(epsilon_0) =3D -K epsilon_0 (E^2 - B^2 c^2)
for some positive constant K. This translates directly into an
equation d^2(log alpha)/d(1/r)^2 =3D k alpha, for some constant k. From
this you can get any of a wide variety of phases, including one that
replicates the features of the Landau Pole.

Other solutions, interestingly, include a phase where the effective
field E approaches a constant as r -> infinity, and alpha -> 0 as r ->
0. These features are called, respectively, "infrared slavery" and
"asymptotic freedom". For non-Abelian gauge fields (SU(3), here) it's
the basis of confinement that rules out the existence of monopole
sources. In this phase, sources with bounded fields can only exist as
dipoles or higher order multipoles (which includes, in SU(3), the 3-
body neutral sources with 3 charges bound to each other).

The 3-Way Kiss -- the Real Life Version
http://www.flickr.com/photos/confusedamused/20988689/
 




 19 Posts in Topic:
Running of the fine structure constant - how exactly?
frank_k_sheldon@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-27 04:32:41 
Re: Running of the fine structure constant - how exactly?
"tnlockyer@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-28 08:52:40 
Re: Running of the fine structure constant - how exactly?
John C. Polasek <jpola  2008-06-28 21:50:33 
Re: Running of the fine structure constant - how exactly?
"tnlockyer@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-29 10:18:28 
Re: Running of the fine structure constant - how exactly?
John C. Polasek <jpola  2008-06-29 23:21:34 
Re: Running of the fine structure constant - how exactly?
"tnlockyer@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-01 16:39:02 
Re: Running of the fine structure constant - how exactly?
"tnlockyer@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-30 09:47:23 
Re: Running of the fine structure constant - how exactly?
John C. Polasek <jpola  2008-06-30 19:50:27 
Re: Running of the fine structure constant - how exactly?
"Sue..." <su  2008-06-30 16:56:29 
Re: Running of the fine structure constant - how exactly?
"tnlockyer@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-30 17:52:41 
Re: Running of the fine structure constant - how exactly?
John C. Polasek <jpola  2008-06-30 22:22:11 
Re: Running of the fine structure constant - how exactly?
Jay Bala <jay1bala@[EM  2008-06-30 19:55:40 
Chaos Theory and Quantum Mechanics (was: Re: Running of ...)
Jay Bala <jay1bala@[EM  2008-06-30 20:22:34 
Re: Running of the fine structure constant - how exactly?
"tnlockyer@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-01 09:21:47 
Re: Running of the fine structure constant - how exactly?
"tnlockyer@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-01 10:24:01 
Re: Running of the fine structure constant - how exactly?
John C. Polasek <jpola  2008-07-01 17:28:31 
Re: Running of the fine structure constant - how exactly?
Rock Brentwood <markwh  2008-07-02 00:33:30 
Re: Chaos Theory and Quantum Mechanics (was: Re: Running of ...)
Jay Bala <jay1bala@[EM  2008-07-02 09:33:19 
Re: Chaos Theory and Quantum Mechanics (was: Re: Running of ...)
Jay Bala <jay1bala@[EM  2008-07-04 16:46:20 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Nov 21 3:01:18 CST 2008.