Re: Expelled: If you don't believe in holy physics dogma ; you're fired!

snip
>>
>
>This mechanical model of yours describes how EM waves propagate
>through the vacuum, so does that mean EM waves will propagate at
>different speeds relative to a laboratory moving at varying speeds
>relative to this "ether"?
You probably haven't taken the time to study the permittivity paper or
you would see that my model first defines how electron pairs are bound
in place in "pairspace" by the equivalent of linear springs to exactly
account for the permittivity of space. It has an exact spring constant
K, which is a major improvement over the Nobel-winning "strong force"
that's just a good idea without any calibration that I know of.
PS is a solid with the Youngs modulus and density that convey EM
signals at the speed of light = sqrt(Y/rho) just as with
sqrt(eps/rho). 
The signals travel absolutely in a rigid pairspace, and with c-v
relative to a receding laboratory which will detect a red****ft. No one
actually measures the speed of light, much as you might think it's a
given.
This pairspace is a dual space to our space. Ancient methods tried to
find an ether that had these properties, but that you could also walk
through.
It's all in the book.
John Polasek