Re: Faraday paradox in non-circular form

"Don Kelly" <dhky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:seckk.149625$gc5.72566@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ----------------------------
> "Terry L Hewett Sr" <terrylhewettsr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:g6ogm5$547$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>I really don't understand why you guys don't understand that a voltage
is 
>>induced in this manner.
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXtG4Dkrp4c
>>
>
> We do understand what is going on here- That's why we don't accept your 
> nonsense. -- 
>
> Don Kelly dhky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> remove the X to answer
>
>

Apparently not. If what i present is "nonsense" than all that Faraday 
contributed is also "nonsense"!? In fact it would be safe to say that 
Faraday met the same initial resistance.
This is sixth grade science. it doesn't take above a childs understanding 
really.
There are only three main principles at play here. Electromagnetic force, 
Kinetic energy, and electromagnetic induction. Anything above that is a 
byproduct of the unified transformations of energy.