Re: Faraday paradox in non-circular form

----------------------------
"Terry L Hewett Sr" <terrylhewettsr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:g6sqt9$6em$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Don Kelly" <dhky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:seckk.149625$gc5.72566@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> ----------------------------
>> "Terry L Hewett Sr" <terrylhewettsr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:g6ogm5$547$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>I really don't understand why you guys don't understand that a voltage
is 
>>>induced in this manner.
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXtG4Dkrp4c
>>>
>>
>> We do understand what is going on here- That's why we don't accept your

>> nonsense. -- 
>>
>> Don Kelly dhky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> remove the X to answer
>>
>>
>
> Apparently not. If what i present is "nonsense" than all that Faraday 
> contributed is also "nonsense"!? In fact it would be safe to say that 
> Faraday met the same initial resistance.
> This is sixth grade science. it doesn't take above a childs
understanding 
> really.
> There are only three main principles at play here. Electromagnetic
force, 
> Kinetic energy, and electromagnetic induction. Anything above that is a 
> byproduct of the unified transformations of energy.



Faraday is OK but in the common form is incomplete. Maxwell'version  is 
better but again is often given in an incomplete form. This factor is not 
taught in 6th grade and apparently not at the university level except in
an 
some texts on electromagnetic machines (and in one graduate level text
that 
I have ).
The thing is that he had observed and repeatable data to draw his 
conclusions from. You have only given fanciful descriptions with an ounce
of 
truth buried in a ton of conjecture.

Given this , you did put up a jpg which showed a ring- apparently what you

are now talking about. It consists of a torus with rings spaced around it.
a)what is the material in the torus? Does it include permanent magnets? 
Spaced apart? If so , by what?
b)what are the rings- coils? Magnets? If the latter, are they toroidal
with 
the poles on the flat faces?

A few other questions and comments may follow but the major one is how do 
you expect such a setup to produce forces to cause motion?




-- 

Don Kelly dhky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 the X to answer

>
>