Re: THE WORLD NEEDS COLD FUSION.

On Jul 31, 9:42 am, Benj <bjac...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Jul 31, 11:17 am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > I was invited to NASA's MSFC, Advanced Concept Office
> > to opine and observe this
experiment,http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/anti_grav_000928.html
> > NASA was absolutely forthright.
> > I wish I could have been more helpful, so I'm
> > still working on the study.
> > The theory really does require a working
> > knowledge of GR and QT.
> > You can see Ning Li's work on "gravitomagnetism"
> > has been published in peer reviewed articles.
> > Regards
> > Ken S. Tucker
>
> Ken,
> It's very interesting that NASA is trying to test the old "anti-
> gravity paint" idea!  Einstein cobbled together the "warped space-
> time" idea of gravity, but really it's just a mathematical description
> with no 'explanation". Much better is the Wheeler-Feynman "shadow'
> theory of gravitation which fits perfectly with the "anti-gravity
> paint" idea. The concept is that the universe is filled with radiation
> of some kind bouncing around in all directions. As two m***** approach
> each other, each mass ****elds the other so that the "radiation
> pressure" forces the two m***** together. Hence, gravity is seen not
> as an "attraction" between m***** but rather as a "push" that forces
> them together.  Hence you are forced earthward by the "****elding" of
> the mass of the earth beneath your feet!
>
> Now here's the food for thought. The so-called "disk" gravity ****eld
> is actually working the "wrong" way!  According to the Wheeler-Feynman
> theory, if the super-conducting disk were truly "****elding gravity"
> then to make an object lighter you'd have to have it OVERHEAD rather
> than UNDER the object as is proposed with the old "anti-gravity paint"
> idea.  The disk should actually be making objects HEAVIER rather than
> lighter!  Just a couple of ideas for you to ponder in your
> observations and opinions.
>
> Of course, I'm sure you've read that I "know nothing about science",
> so if you'd rather not think about these off-beat ideas, you should
> probably simply adopt without proof the opinions of the people here
> who are "smarter then Einstein". They will tell you exactly what to
> think and what to say.  Just accept everything they write without
> question and they will like you!
>
> I may have to poke my snoopy nose into these experiments!  I wonder
> how close the "test device" is to completion?

There are certain proprietary considerations,
but I hope you post what you find out.
I'm quite amazed that this class of experiment
such as cold-fusion and gravity-attentuation
get people (like Shultz) so emotional, when
they can't ever understand the problem.
I don't understand women of the opposite ***,
but I do not deny they exists :-).
Regards
Ken S. Tucker