Re: THE WORLD NEEDS COLD FUSION.

On Aug 1, 9:17=A0am, "Ken S. Tucker" <dynam...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> There are certain proprietary considerations,
> but I hope you post what you find out.
> I'm quite amazed that this class of experiment
> such as cold-fusion and gravity-attentuation
> get people (like Shultz) so emotional, when
> they can't ever understand the problem.
> I don't understand women of the opposite ***,
> but I do not deny they exists :-).

I understand the proprietary thing and would not be surprised if they
just told me to "pound salt". But the name of that VP is familiar to
me and I may have actually worked with him in the past if it is the
same guy!  I guess I can hope to get lucky.

As for Shultz, he's just into faith-based physics and like all
religious people he gets real emotional when someone starts to
question his established dogma.  You are right, understanding "women
of the opposite ***" is difficult, but for a real challenge try to
understand "women of the same ***!"  :-)