#127 easy to explain why Superconductors are zero resistance but

plutonium.archime...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> plutonium.archime...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> > David R Tribble wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Well, I'd like "to know" if you made any measurements of the zero
> > > resistance in your superconductivity experiment.
> >
>
> That is an easy answer: Capacitor Currents are all about Conservation
> of Energy.
> Energy put in, is equal to energy coming out. So as long as you have
> ultra cold
> or you have Capacitor currents the Zero Resistance is merely the
> Conservation
> of Energy.
>
> In other currents like AC or DC, there is also Conservation of Energy
> but it includes
> a large chunk going to Resistance.
>

So the world has at least three distinct types of currents:

DC
AC
Capacitor Current and I am now going to give it a name of CC

So Conservation of Energy easily explains away the zero resistance in
CC. Where there is
no resistance in a Lightning Flash and no resistance in a Wimshurst
generator CC and no
resistance in a mercury at 4 Kelvin as a CC. So zero resistance is
simply the acknowledgement
that of Conservation of Energy, where energy in is equal to energy out
in the form of electricity
and none to resistance.

But the bigger puzzle is why does these three currents:

DC
AC
CC

Why does only the CC have ideal-diamagnetism? Why does not the AC or
DC have ideal-diamagnetism?

Obviously, it must have something to do with the fact that resistance
cancels ideal-diamagnetism.

Now there are proofs that CC exists and is the current that creates
superconduction by means of
converting AC or DC into that of CC. So when we convert a AC current
into a Capacitor Current we
lose some of the energy in the conversion, but that once the CC is
created there is no loss to resistance.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies