Re: THE WORLD NEEDS COLD FUSION.

In sci.physics.fusion Benj <bjacoby@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

: As for Shultz, he's just into faith-based physics and like all
: religious people he gets real emotional when someone starts to
: question his established dogma.  

What's amusing (other than your inability to spell my name) is that, like
most fanatics, you project your own inability to behave rationally onto
me.
I seriously doubt that you can point to a single thing that I've written
that could reasonably characterized as "real emotional."  On the other 
hand, instead of dealing with the very real fundamental physics issues
(e.g. the observation that fusion has been observed at room temperature,
and, as expected, it behaves just like fusion that occurs at high
temperatures -- "then, a miracle happens" is not normally considered a
reasonable way of dealing with a problem in physics), you spend your time
talking about me.  That may be flattering, but it really doesn't have much
to do with the issue at hand.

-----
Richard Schultz                              schultr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
". . .Mr Schutz [sic] acts like a functional electro-terrorist who 
impeads [sic] scientific communications with his too oft-silliness."
   -- Mitchell Swartz, sci.physics.fusion article
<EEI1oz.43q@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>