On Aug 2, 7:44am, jim <j...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Jerry wrote:
> I know of no better way to learn something than to do it for yourself.
Agreed!
> Reading about things is only memorization. True learning comes from
> doing.
>
> IMHO, it is wise to say as little as possible when it comes to theory
> and experimentation until such time as you have answers that can be
> objectively proven via scientific experiments by others - independent of
> your help.
>
> Thanks for your posts.
Regardless of the merits of your ideas, it's good that you've
chosen to post on sci.physics.research. Being moderated, posting
on this group automatically insulates you the screaming madhouse
that exists on the other groups to which you have crossposted.
Yours is just the sort of proposal that would attract undue
attention from, for example, "overunity" homopolar generator
fanatics
You seem to be a very honest (if somewhat naive) amateur
experimentalist. I can tell you in advance that no matter what
sorts of variations you add to your original experiment, you
won't succeed in achieving permanent motion. But as you say,
there is no better way of learning something than doing it
yourself, and you can get a lot of enjoyment even from "failed"
experiments.
So good luck, and remember to have fun!
Jerry
|
