Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Science > Electromagnetics > #129 Experiment...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 8 Topic 2990 of 3245
Post > Topic >>

#129 Experiment proving Capacitor-Current is Superconductor; new

by plutonium.archimedes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Aug 3, 2008 at 01:12 PM

zzbunker@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2:44=EF=BF=BDpm, plutonium.archime...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

> >
> > But the bigger puzzle is why does these three currents:
> >
> > DC
> > AC
> > CC
> >
> > Why does only the CC have ideal-diamagnetism? Why does not the AC or
> > DC have ideal-diamagnetism?
>
>    Because your CC is the ONLY of the of the three that use magnetism
> of ANY KIND.

Here is a simple Experimental Proof that CC is the superconductor
current.


What we have displayed as a Experimental setup are various conductors
and superconductors.
And we take what feeds their energy consumption in full account. We
want a specified outcome
of electrical energy of specified amperage over a specified time. Let
us say we want 1 amps
over 24 hours.

Stall One has copper wire at room temperature and is fed by AC
current, or we could rig it to feed
DC

Stall Two has the latest perovskite superconductor of Yttrium at 90K

Now the flaw in physicist and chemist analysis is a flaw of not
looking at the entire picture of the
energy transformations.

So we feed Stall One and Two so as to deliver precisely 1 amps over 24
hours.

Now the energy feeding of Stall One is just a house current hooked up
to the local electrical grid
and we have some resistance in the copper wire so that we have to
compensate during those 24
hours with a bit of added electricity to make up for the resistance.
So basically the input energy
is going to be slightly more than 1 amps over 24 hours

Now in Stall Two the input energy is enormously larger than Stall One
because of the refrigeration
required to keep stall two at 90K. So we have the input energy of both
the 1 amps over 24 hours but also
the refrigeration energy over 24 hours.

Now, we set up Stall Three where we feed in the 1 amps over 24 hours
only the current is not going to be
AC or DC but rather is going to be CC, a Capacitor current. In this
stall we make the copper wire into
a Wimshurst machine of electrodes and the 1 amps over 24 hours is a
series of capacitor buildups and
discharges.

Now in total energy consumption of the three stalls involved, the
lowest consumer of electricity is going
to be the Wimshurst Stall, for the energy in is equal to the energy
out due to Conservation of Energy.
The stall that will always be the loser of these three is the
superconductor stall because it eats up not
only the input electricity but the energy to keep it under
refrigeration.

Summary Reflection: the perovskite superconductor has zero-resistance
because it is a Capacitor Current
of the Conservation of Energy where input equals output.

But there is no need to look for a material that is room temperature
superconductive because all you
have to do is build the wire as a Wimshurst Generator.

What mercury at 4K and Barium perovskite at 35K and Yttrium perovskite
at 90K have in common is that
their crystal structure makes them act like a Wimshurst generator at
those temperatures.

The world already has room temperature superconductors, only the
physicists and chemists never
recognized it, yet it was under their noses all along. A Lightning
bolt is a superconductor for it is a
Capacitor Current and a Wimshurst generator or a Van de Graaff
generator current is a superconductor
current at room temperature.

Zero Resistance in electricity is merely the fact that Conservation of
Energy has input equal to output.
There is no resistance in an atom when its electron moves from one
orbital to a second orbital. That means
Resistance in physics is not a fundamental property of matter nor is
it a fundamental property of
electricity and magnetism.

Stall Two is never going to be a better energy saver than Stall One of
its connection to the local
electric power grid. But Stall One can be improved upon by converting
the AC or DC current into
a Capacitor Current.

The final picture appears to be that electrical energy power grid will
never be improved upon its copper
wire system of AC and DC. Superconductivity is never going to change
the present day power
grid system in any significant way.


Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 




 8 Posts in Topic:
#126 likely explanation of ball-lightning as a form of the Meiss
plutonium.archimedes@[EMA  2008-08-01 11:08:32 
#127 easy to explain why Superconductors are zero resistance but
plutonium.archimedes@[EMA  2008-08-01 11:44:30 
#128 Mathematical Relationship connecting AC,DC,CC with
plutonium.archimedes@[EMA  2008-08-02 10:44:35 
Re: #127 easy to explain why Superconductors are zero resistance
"zzbunker@[EMAIL PRO  2008-08-03 08:24:45 
#129 Experiment proving Capacitor-Current is Superconductor; new
plutonium.archimedes@[EMA  2008-08-03 13:12:32 
#126 likely explanation of ball-lightning as a form of the
John Savage <rookswood  2008-08-10 05:20:41 
#134 likely explanation of ball-lightning as a form of the Meiss
plutonium.archimedes@[EMA  2008-08-10 00:21:00 
Re: #134 likely explanation of ball-lightning as a form of the
John Savage <rookswood  2008-08-12 06:54:00 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Dec 3 14:38:36 CST 2008.