Re: is the magnetic field really moving?

<phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:g77kr22qe8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 23:04:29 -0500 Terry L Hewett Sr 
> <terrylhewettsr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
> If the field _strength_ remains constant, then what is generating the 
> potential?
>
Being a constant implicates a perpetual state, a infinite state, a state
of 
equalibreum. Be it from seemingly rest energy or the act of
transformation. 
to achieve bieng a constant is to implicate satisfying conditions of 
conservation of energy, thermodynamics and entropy. To understand this is
to 
acknowledge that these states exist in nature at random. They do and the
one 
component that is allways present with magnetic fields in nature MASS.
This 
should indicate that mass is magnetism. The greater the mass the more
dense 
the stronger the field. The greater the resistance to change.

The componants of the magnetic fields are not bothered by mass. They are 
free to wander through it minimally uneffected. it doesn't stop where the 
(physically entangeled m*****) meet. allow two magnets to attract and pair

the attraction is constant. to assume it stops when the m***** meet is 
erronious. the field is not effected by the mass. In short the flux field
is 
what allows the transformation of energy between the poles and entangled 
fields. it doesn't matter how many flux fields are paired the energy is 
channeled through them effortlessly to emerge as strong as it entered the 
initial flux field.

The photon in nature is traveling the path of infinity lensed by the flux 
fields where the paths near. if there is multiple flux fields the photons 
path will continue through the flux fields lensing (spinning and flipping)

as the photon is going through the wormhole of flux fields. till it
emerges 
from the other end to do an about face and re enter the flux field or
fields 
if multiple. The photons origin is somewhere within the mass and directly 
entangled through attractive and repulsive forces that are a byproduct of 
the photons polar presence.

> If the magnet (full circle) is rotated around Faraday's stationary disk,

> what
> is the disk "seeing" from the field?
>
>

same thing it see's if the magnet is stationary and the disc is rotated.
the 
entire flux field physically occupies the mass of the disk. the photon and

the electron share symmetry strong and weak forces differ between the two.

the disk is conductive. the magnet as a byproduct of charge with flux
field 
present and photons happily doing their dance at nearly light speed. the 
photons for a brief moment share charges exciting the electrons within the

copper disk. rotating the disc or moving the magnets around the disk only 
serves as the mechanism to move the deteriorating electron charge to the 
pickup mechanism or means of inducing the carried charge.