Re: Induction: Aetherists lend me a hand!

On Aug 6, 8:13=A0am, "hhc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <hhc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> If it cannot be employed to make useful, measurable predictions, then
> you are only preaching imaginary bull****!

Lessee. Which "theory" is better? Keplerian analytic geometry or the
previous system of epicycles? Which one has the better math? Which one
gives the "correct" answer? What is it that makes one system "better"
than the other?

Hint: Both systems are WRONG!  The stability of the solar system has
never been shown mathematically. And BOTH give equally accurate
answers for practical problems. The difference between them lies in
the insight of the simplicity of one POINT OF VIEW over the other.
So. What is a "point of view"? Duh. It's a "model". Get it? Yeah, I
thought not.

God I pray that you are not out there drumming your moronic philosophy
into young pliable minds!
Please! Say it ain't so!

> Fools revel in in these types of speculation simply because they are
> too lazy or stupid to learn even scientific basics.

Right, sure. Parroting establishment nonsense really takes a LOT of
work and a LOT of intelligence!  Hint: the thing you seem to be
missing here is called "thinking for yourself" or just thinking at
all!

You are wasting everyone's time here.