Re: Induction: Aetherists lend me a hand!

On Aug 6, 12:34=A0pm, "Szczepan Bialek" <sz.bia...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> >Therefore tell us more about how a gas-analogy Biot-Savart law would
wor=
k!
>
> Biot-Savard is from fluid dynamics. I do not know if now are ready math
i=
n
> gas dynamics. Maybe is it too late for such. Now is time of computers
> models.

Hey, it's never too late. But yes, I know what you mean about computer
models (or more exactly numerical approximations)  And I do understand
how Biot-Savart (And Maxwell, of course) are all fluid models. I"m not
sure what the change to gas dynamics from a perfect fluid does to
"open up" theory.

> Of course we do not need magnetic field. The alternate charge density
> produce an alternate electric field.

Yes, magnetic field is not needed in fact CANNOT be used because it's
not causal to the E field. However, I can see how alternate charge
density can produce alternate electric fields. And presumably that
"might" be transmitted over a distance to produce the E fields of
Induction. Exactly how, though isn't clear to me, but I did love the
"vortex" suggestions as one way of explaining the parallel rather than
radial forces produced.

> In electrostatics charged body moves electrons in an adjacent conductor.
=
In
> electrdynamics the alternate charge density in one conductor produces
the
> oscillating current in the other.

But of course the forces of induction are not alternating (except very
long term) so one wonders how that might produce induction. I might
suggest, however, that a rotating vortex does indeed project an
"alternation" when viewed from the side. Perhaps there is something of
value there?

> The fluid dynamics models are a "pieces to teach".

Of course one serious problem with "aether theory" is that the
proposed properties of the luminiferous aether are so extreme that any
classification into "fluid dynamics" or "gas dynamics" or "vibrations
in solids" doesn't seem possible because they ALL seem to apply!

Interesting!