Re: Induction: Aetherists lend me a hand!

On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 03:31:12 -0700 (PDT), Benj <bjacoby@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>On Aug 5, 10:21 pm, Aetherist <TheAether...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> >The causality relations Between B or A and E are not there. Hint: a
>> >changing B does not cause E and a changing E does not cause B!
>>
>> Well perhaps Maxwell himself can help you, see:
>>
>> http://vacuum-physics.com/Maxwell/maxwell_oplf.pdf
>>
>> This also has visual aids,
>>
>> http://www.cft.edu.pl/~birula/publ/VortEM.pdf
>>
>> Cheers,
>
> YES! The vortex model is a kind of answer here!  Very interesting
> papers and ideas even though they are separated in time by a large
> value!  A current as a source of "vortexes" which as Maxwell noted can
> create a "tension" or "flux line" along the axis of rotation can also
> be spewed into space in a spherical "explosion": that mimics the
> mathematics of Induction. However if the axes of the vortices are all
> parallel, it "explains" the unitary direction of the resultant E
> field!
>
> VERY interesting hint!
> Obviously most of the people posting here don't have a clue what we
> are talking about!

That's not really true, however most don't give a hoot about trying
to visualize such things.  The mathematics is ALL that matters.  

I think its left brain - right brain thing.  Right brain types need to
visualize to own it.  Tesla and Faraday are examples of these types.
You still do need the math to quantify things (although Tesla and
Faraday did wonders without it).

Regards
>
>Thanks for the hint!