plutonium.archime...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Last time I did these experiments I used only a Wimshurst, but now am
> using both.
>
> I have metal coil lathe shavings of iron and magnetized several and
> tied a dental-floss string to one
> which was magnetized over 12 hours ago. Tested its "slight magnetism"
> with an unmagnetized shaving.
> The weight of this shaving with string was so small that my scale of
> 1/10 gram could not weigh it.
> So will have to build a balancing beam capable of measuring the weight
> of the iron shaving.
> The length of the iron shaving is approx 3.5 cm. and its diameter
> approx 0.7 cm.
>
>
> Operated both the Wimshurst and VandeGraaf and then placed a compass-
> needle at the north-pole of
> the electrode (largest electrode on VandeGraaf) and again noticed the
> deflection of the needle 90 degrees.
>
> Operated both machines again to fill capacitors. Now while in
> operation, hung the iron-shaving attached
> to the dental-floss at the north-pole of the large electrode on the
> VandeGraaf and as expected it
> acted as a ideal-diamagnet or the Meissner Effect. However, the iron
> shaving at the equator of the
> VandeGraaf was attracted as well as my hair on my arms was attracted.
> As for the Wimshurst, at the pole of either of the electrodes the
> Meissner
> effect occurred.
>
> And finally on the northpole of the capacitors of the Wimshurst
> displayed a Meissner Effect
> on the iron-shaving.
>
> So here again, in August a repeating of my experimentation in March of
> 2008, that I again achieve
> a Meissner Effect from Capacitor-Current of both VandeGraaff and
> Wimshurst generators.
>
> I challenge anyone to duplicate the results.
>
> P.S. this is not Lenz's law as one mistaken responder opined, for he
> could have said that
> all Meissner tests are Lenz's law under such a mistake.
>
Did some measuring tonight for the actual deflection of a Meissner
Effect. These measurements
were done on the north-pole of the electrodes on both generators.
Uncharged Wimshurst: one electrode northpole repeled the iron coil
whilst the other attracted. I am still
trying to explain this attraction as perhaps an induced attraction.
Will try it again tomorrow night.
Uncharged VandeGraaff: Both the large electrode and small electrode
attracted. So here I have a
disconformity. In the Wimshurst one electrode attracted at the
northpole whilst the other electrode
at the northpole repelled.
Charged Wimshurst: Both electrodes repelled the iron coil shaving and
the size of the deflection was
equal to the distance of the electrode gap and was 2 cm approx.
Charged VandeGraaff: Both electrodes repelled the iron coil shaving
and the large electrode deflection
was 7 cm, the size of the gap between the two electrodes. The small
electrode deflected the coil also
but its deflection was approx 3 cm (and a trouble here is to separate
out the influence of the large
electrode from the measure.)
So here I suspect is evidence of a Meissner Effect upon Wimshurst and
Van de Graaff generators,
both would be room temperature superconductors.
And this whole experiment plays into the idea that cold temperature
superconductors are merely
the transforming of materials to act as Capacitors. So mercury at 4
Kelvin or the perovskite superconductors
at 35 K or 90 K were merely acting as the capacitors of a Wimshurst
Generator as electricity flow
from an outside source is the flow of electricity between my
electrodes of my generators.
So as chemists and physicists find new materials that are
superconductors, what they merely are doing
is finding materials that are Capacitors.
So, according to my theory, even the Sun and stars have superconductor
currents running in their
plasmas, since all that is needed is a capacitor. And every time we
view a lightning bolt here on
Earth, we witness a superconductor current where the clouds and ground
were capacitors.
So the phenomenon of "Ball Lightning" was probably the worlds first
view of the Meissner Effect, provided
all or part of my above is correct.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
|
