#132 solve the disconformity, Meissner Effect deflection by Wimshurst
by plutonium.archimedes@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aug 7, 2008 at 01:02 AM
Earlier tonight I wrote:
>
> Uncharged Wimshurst: one electrode northpole repeled the iron coil
> whilst the other attracted. I am still
> trying to explain this attraction as perhaps an induced attraction.
> Will try it again tomorrow night.
>
> Uncharged VandeGraaff: Both the large electrode and small electrode
> attracted. So here I have a
> disconformity. In the Wimshurst one electrode attracted at the
> northpole whilst the other electrode
> at the northpole repelled.
>
I think I spotted the problem. The VandeGraaff has a large iron screw
at the northpole
of the large electrode. So if it were not there, it would have
repelled instead of attracted.
So now both machines conform.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies