Re: THE WORLD NEEDS COLD FUSION.

"Richard Schultz" <schultr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:g6m555$fac$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In sci.physics.fusion Ken S. Tucker <dynamics@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> "You don't even have a clue about which clue you're missing."
The thread (mostly) dissapeared when I reinstalled my system, so I'll just
****ge my way in here if I may.
As I said previously, I don't beleive, nor disbelieve, in Coldfusion.
I had hoped to see some meaningfull discusion that might offer some
understanding of what is/has been happening in some experiments re.
coldfusion but I've been dissapointed.
What I beleive appears to be virtualy indisputable is the massive thermal
output of a great many experimental runs.  That appears to be (to me) the
one relatively consistant phenomena.
If one were to disregard the claims of corresponding helium production
(for
whatever reason you choose) one is still stuck trying to explain the
anomolous thermal output.
This anomaly in itself seems to be without explaination, perhaps.
I do believe that Irving Langmuir's discoveries re. atomic hydrogen might
be
a clue.  He too observed anomolous thermal output in monotomic hydrogen
during  recombination.  This work is now almost 100 years old and
apparently
largely forgotten or overlooked.
Perhaps that is a 'clue', perhaps.
Vince Morgan