Re: is the magnetic field really moving?

On 19 Aug, 17:20, "Terry L Hewett Sr" <terrylhewet...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> "blackhead" <larryhar...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:318d970f-567d-47fc-a175-1b42c8783a4a@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 19 Aug, 15:28, "Terry L Hewett Sr" <terrylhewet...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > <phil-news-nos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> >news:g8ckep12bp6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 20:26:56 -0500 Terry L Hewett Sr
> > > <terrylhewet...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > | I've did some experiments as well. (smiling)
> > >
|http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!ringdrawingincomplete.jpg
> > >
|http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!ringofmagnetswithspacers.jpg
> > > |http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!centipedalfieldring.jpg
> > > |http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!multipolearrangement.jpg
> > > |http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/prototypes.html
> > > |
> > > | this would be the way of removing the field along wires. forget
> > > faradays
> > > | disk. This mechanism is the next generation faradays disc like it
or
> > > not.
> > > | still dependent on faradays principles. I the inventor am sure
that
> > > had
> > > | faraday continued he would have invented this himself.
>
> > > It might be possible to understand what you did if you had more
detail,
> > > and
> > > had pictures that associated the different parts together. But you
label
> > > this
> > > as a transformer. What problem with transformers is this solving?
>
>
>http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/CentipedalDrive.jpghttp://t...
>
> > In general transformers transform energy to do work. be it stepping
> > up/down
> > voltages or actually moving mass. If you havn't noticed
transformations
> > are
> > limited to sets of one transformation. Example: fuel to kinetic for
the
> > work. fuel gets used up in the transformation transformation stops.
End
> > game. I'm sorry i cannot accept that.
>
> > Here's a unique concept lets uphold the laws of thermodynamics.
>
> > The resolution is to transform energy cyclic in sets that compliment
> > eachother effectively closing the system. the SRTT set is "elec to
kinetic
> > to elec". Via electromotive force the toroid armature is spun thus
kinetic
> > energy and it's multiple by-products. the work is used to further
> > transform
> > the energy back to elec via electromagnetic induction. (the medium to
> > drive
> > multiple changing magnetic flux fields through several induction coils
> > cyclic.)
>
> > Invention is the marriage of mechanics and the sciences With
> > innovations in both fields.
>
> But what does your "invention" do?
>
> It is essentially a dynamo that is self contained, a stand alone source
of
> energy.

Which a dynamo is already.

Faradays induction run amuk. generates electricity in the form of DC
> with the potential to generate a design spacific voltage for extremely
long
> times probably beyond centuries. NO JOKE!

A standard alternator in a car does this already with diodes and a
voltage regulator cheaply. I seriously doubt whether you really have
something which hasn't been thought of before. But it would be
interesting if you could show us a diagram of it, rather than
incoherent pictures.


>
>
> > Terry- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -