Re: is the magnetic field really moving?

"Salmon Egg" <SalmonEgg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:SalmonEgg-F7E4C4.11171120082008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <g8h5u3$u60$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "Terry L Hewett Sr" <terrylhewettsr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> Energy cannot be created or destroyed it can only be transformed. You 
>> have
>> to understand that energy has many forms or manifestations. The 
>> biological
>> happenings in your body is a transformation of energy. a plant
transforms
>> energy which we modeled the solar cell after. electronics transform 
>> energy.
>> in short most things transform energy in one way or another.
>
> I think that you mean "converted" rather than "transformed." If you look
> at a transformer as a black box, the input is electrical energy and the
> output is also electrical energy. Output is equal to the input less any
> losses from convert=sion of electrical energy into  heat energy. In the
> process, entropy is increased. What is "transformed" is the impedance
> level of the electrical energy.
>
> Think of force being analogous to voltage with displacement distance
> being analogous to current. That is why a transformer is the electrical
> equivalent of a lever.
>
> Bill

Agreed on the lever thing. That would make the fulcrum of this lever the 
flux?
I do mean transformer spacifically in reference to my invention SRTT. For 
the better part it was designed for the sole purpose of transforming
energy 
from elec to kinetic to elec to kinetic to elec to kinetic to elec cyclic 
for infinity or until acted upon by a outside source.  It is a closed
system 
of transformations. However i suspect that closed is used as a loose term.

componants needing the elec produced such as independent circuitry are 
simply induced into the system and welcomed as part of the system.