Re: is the magnetic field really moving?

On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:46:15 -0500 Terry L Hewett Sr
<terrylhewettsr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

| A lever must have a fulcrum to be a lever. I'm going to stick with my
first 
| assumption of flux. the core is more the lever than the fulcrum.

Consider a hydraulic lift.  Where's the fulcrum?

The need for a fulcrum is merely an effect of a particular mechanical
model.
The flux is a part of electromagnetism.  If you have one you have the
other
everywhere.

So dismiss the idea of trying to find a fulcrum.  It's nothing more than a
reference point of an asymmetric system.

I'm still wondering what your invention does for me that a transformer
cannot
besides having moving parts that would fail within a decade of continuous
use.

-- 
|WARNING: Due to extreme spam, googlegroups.com is blocked.  Due to
ignorance |
|         by the abuse department, bellsouth.net is blocked.  If you post
to  |
|         Usenet from these places, find another Usenet provider ASAP.    
   |
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (email for humans: first name in lower case at
ipal.net) |