Re: is the magnetic field really moving?

<phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:g8khbs12i5s@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:46:15 -0500 Terry L Hewett Sr 
> <terrylhewettsr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> | A lever must have a fulcrum to be a lever. I'm going to stick with my 
> first
> | assumption of flux. the core is more the lever than the fulcrum.
>
> Consider a hydraulic lift.  Where's the fulcrum?

hydraulic pump via torsion.

>
> The need for a fulcrum is merely an effect of a particular mechanical 
> model.
> The flux is a part of electromagnetism.  If you have one you have the 
> other
> everywhere.

every mechanical model manmade and naturally occuring share this fulcrum.
to 
truly see it's im****tance is to fully understand it's role within the 
mechanism. it is the one relative thing to everything.

I say 9p temple 1 is a transformer transforming energies between mars and 
jupiter as a natural mechanism. The whole point is that just because we 
don't see the apparent effects doesn't ignore the fact that it takes place

with or without our understanding of it. Were like a bird on a wire.

>
> So dismiss the idea of trying to find a fulcrum.  It's nothing more than
a
> reference point of an asymmetric system.
>
> I'm still wondering what your invention does for me that a transformer 
> cannot
> besides having moving parts that would fail within a decade of
continuous 
> use.
>

Well hows freeing you from the grid sound? Freeing you from a costly fuel 
habit. eliminate the need for batteries. Imagine a world where everything
is 
self powered. Do you understand what this technology can do for space 
exploration? just in the capacity of supplying a pre determined voltage
for 
potentially centuries. space travel could be a reality within your
expectant 
decade of use. You got to love the byproducts of spinning mass and their 
apparent link to stabilization in space.

As for science physics my mechanism is "the model" I predict centuries of 
formulation to describe what I refer to as a simple mechanism. All physics

will benifit from this knowledge. Many theories will be better understood
as 
absolute. SR and GR are two different accounts of the same thing. There
are 
more to be discovered given the multifarious nature of natural physics and

the proper model as example. Space and time are ultimately relative to 
eachother given the proper model. wave harmonics and frequency of change
are 
same relative through the natural sine in short everything is relative 
through the radius of the natural sine.