Re: is the magnetic field really moving?

----------------------------
<phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:g8nbas2irp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:42:37 -0500 Terry L Hewett Sr 
> <terrylhewettsr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> |
> | <phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> | news:g8khbs12i5s@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |> On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:46:15 -0500 Terry L Hewett Sr
> |> <terrylhewettsr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

------------snip----------
>
> |>
> |
> | Well hows freeing you from the grid sound? Freeing you from a costly 
> fuel
> | habit. eliminate the need for batteries. Imagine a world where 
> everything is
> | self powered. Do you understand what this technology can do for space
> | exploration? just in the capacity of supplying a pre determined
voltage 
> for
> | potentially centuries. space travel could be a reality within your 
> expectant
> | decade of use. You got to love the byproducts of spinning mass and
their
> | apparent link to stabilization in space.
>
> Are you saying this technology makes energy from nothing?  If so, I want

> to
> see some proof.  That _may_ be in the form of construction details clear
> enough to actually construct it.  What your web page showed is far from 
> it.
> Alternatively, show me all the materials used to construct it so I can
see
> that no energy storage device (battery, for example, or fuel) is
involved,
> and no otherwise consumable material is involved (unless it's as cheap
as
> dirt and doesn't require a lot).  Then construct it in isolation that 
> prevents
> access to any other material or parts (if you want to hide from me how
it 
> is
> built).  Then show me how much power it produces, and lets run it for a 
> month
> and see how much energy it can produce.
>
> Otherwise, such a claim gets classified as the quackery it seems to be.
------------

lol: I gave up on Terry some time ago- lots of handwaving but nothing
more.

-- 

Don Kelly dhky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 the X to answer