Re: is the magnetic field really moving?

<phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:g8qarl3dag@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:00:51 -0500 Terry L Hewett Sr 
> <terrylhewettsr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> | <phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> | news:g8nbas2irp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |> On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:42:37 -0500
> |>
> |> Are you saying this technology makes energy from nothing?
> |
> | Not what I'm saying at all. However i am saying that this technology 
> uses
> | well known and currently applied mechanical interractions to a new 
> mechanism
> | that has the potential to transform energy in a cyclic manner for a
very
> | long time with little or no losses.
>
> Is there an input of energy in some form?  What form?

No input or output. it is a closed system. There is only induction into
the 
system. in short the electrical aperatus you are powering is induced into 
the system and becomes a part of the closed system. Maintaining system 
integrity.

With that said and should be understood that is under normal operating 
conditions. There is a inital startup that would have to be from an
outside 
source.


>
> I'm assuming the output of energy is electrical (a useful form), or one 
> that
> could easily be converted to electrical.  If you can produce 100 watts
of
> power continuously, how many joules per seconds of energy input is this
> device getting?


Again no input or output.

>
>
> | You will NEVER remove the storage mechanism from any mechanism man
made 
> or
> | occuring naturally. In the case of the SRTT it is flywheel energy as a
> | storage mechanism. in fact the polar arrangement of the multipole
toroid
> | armature and the multipole belt are a looped dipole arrangement. the 
> SRTT
> | uses this arrangement for storage. The unnamed invention i refer to as
a
> | mechanical trinket doesn't use this dipole arrangement for storage. It

> does
> | use a battery bank wired in such a manner that the battery bank is
> | essentially a low pass filter.
>
> So the output is not smooth DC.  What is it?  Pulsed DC?  AC?

If i were to put each internal componanent of  the system in terms of
input 
and output both input and output are a consistant with DC.


>
>
> | I wouldn't suggest that just anyone build the SRTT as i have built 
> prototype
> | #6 (multipart). It is designed as a ONE PIECE toroid armature. The 
> multipart
> | construction is the equivilent of a unique fragmentation device. You 
> DON"T
> | have my permission to toy with this technology in any other capacity 
> than to
> | contemplate  it's workings. However if you take it upon yourself to 
> actually
> | build a prototype of the SRTT i cannot be held responsible for loss of

> life
> | or limb.
>
> Lack of permission from you means nothing unless there is a patent.  I
can
> accept your lack of legal liability.  If I come to know how to build
this
> device, I believe I could determine its risk.

Prepairing for the multitude of potential risks is more my worry. proper 
facilities are a must.
When things go wrong they go horribly wrong post haste. think for a minute

were toying with a frictionless mechanism that has the potential to meet
or 
exceed any frequency of change we are aware of and probably many we don't 
know of or have benchmarked per say. Design variations may bring us to
this 
point but for now it is not designed to approach a harmful range.



>
>
> | If you want to experiment with the following technology feel free to. 
> Just
> | don't forget who you got it from, I want proper noteriety and a copy
of 
> your
> | works. It would be in err to assume that your going to manufacture 
> without
> | my express knowledge and cooperation.  I feel it is safer at this
point 
> as a
> | multipart construction.
> | http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!mechtrinket2.jpg
>
> You have a patent, or have applied for one?
>
> Why do you put ! characters in URLs or file names?  Strange.

Not so strange. just a personal thing i do on occation. when considering
the 
thousands of images one creates or use on websites it is simpler than
coding 
or decoding something like this 7r90t21j65.jpg on a consistant basis when 
editing websites. It is also an indicator that the person viewing the 
spacific range of images is a person of interest through website
statistics.

I sent out hundreds of emails with the images and text pertaining to this 
and other technology of mine. it is a way of seeing if they actually
viewed 
the images or just discarded the email.

>
>
> | I am currently building prototype #1. it will likely have a hand crank
> | instead of a low volt dc motor and controller. the multipart belt is a

> pain
> | trying to get the rubber spacers precisely cut uniformly. i have made
a 
> jig
> | for this however 1 in 10 p***** my quality control.
> |
> | I cannot stress enough that my inventions are *multifarious* in a 
> multitude
> | of ways. Scale is a primary consideration. small is good in this 
> particular
> | mechanism for it's potential application. Allthough this mechanism is 
> using
> | the same multipole configuration as the SRTT it is not dependent on 
> rigid
> | spinning mass to drive the multiple flux fields through the induction 
> coils
> | cyclic.
>
> Maybe you can explain what it really does.

In short sustain the dipole of the storage mechanism.

>
>
> |> Then construct it in isolation that prevents
> |> access to any other material or parts (if you want to hide from me
how 
> it
> |> is
> |> built).
> |
> | I'm not bieng carr here in any way. it should be pretty apparent what
> | materials and parts are used.
>
> Huh?  I can't figure out much from the web site and photos and drawings.
>
> For example, for all magnets, you should show the field orientation of
the
> magnets in a drawing, or added to a photo.
>

Ok i need a key on some images and my communication skills are fairly 
minimal. It would be much easier if i was of academia or if i could
express 
it in mathematical terms. However that is not the case. I'm a unaccredited

benchtop inventor who's invention has drawn me into the very heart of 
natural physics. Seemingly challenging science physics on several levels. 
That's not to say that my own understanding hasn't been challenged over
the 
course of a decade or two.

>
> |> Then show me how much power it produces, and lets run it for a month
> |> and see how much energy it can produce.
> |>
> |
> | Untill i can implement design spacific componants or computer modeling

> the
> | SRTT is at a stand still in research and developement.
>
> Let me know when it works.  Be sure to patent it.
>
> -- 
I allready told you it works. What's more im****tant, that mankind
understand 
the very basis of natural physics, or terry selfishly worry about lining
his 
pockets with cash? However don't assume i havn't took measures to protect
my 
interests.

In all realities i never had money, i don't have money and it is likely i 
will never have money.
I will probably die two weeks before my technology is realized. Adding my 
name to the list of dead inventors that never lived to see their
greatness. 
Effectively robbing mankind of the oppertunity of any real understanding
of 
the concept through the inventors eyes. Why should i be any different?
hell 
einstien gave several lectures on e=mc2 and it still isn't fully
understood. 
there are volumes of text on gravity and we as a commonwealth of knowledge

still don't have a clue.

The truth is that natural physics closely guards it's secrets by non 
disclosure. If we want to know those secrets we have to discover them. In 
many cases we have discovered some key bits of information and academia
has 
did a wonderful job of catagorizing them into se****ate fields of study.
That 
is a err natural physics would be better understood if academia recognized

that natural physics encomp***** everything in the universe and each is 
relevant to each other equally.