Re: is the magnetic field really moving?

<phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:g8v4v4328ap@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:34:56 -0500 Terry L Hewett Sr 
> <terrylhewettsr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> |
> | <phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> | news:g8qarl3dag@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:00:51 -0500 Terry L Hewett Sr
> |> <terrylhewettsr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> |>
> |> | <phil-news-nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> |> | news:g8nbas2irp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |> |> On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:42:37 -0500
> |> |>
> |> |> Are you saying this technology makes energy from nothing?
> |> |
> |> | Not what I'm saying at all. However i am saying that this
technology
> |> uses
> |> | well known and currently applied mechanical interractions to a new
> |> mechanism
> |> | that has the potential to transform energy in a cyclic manner for a

> very
> |> | long time with little or no losses.
> |>
> |> Is there an input of energy in some form?  What form?
> |
> | No input or output. it is a closed system. There is only induction
into 
> the
> | system. in short the electrical aperatus you are powering is induced 
> into
> | the system and becomes a part of the closed system. Maintaining system
> | integrity.
>
> If there is no output of electricity, what good is it for me?  I'm
looking
> for ways to generate electricity.  I expect to obey the laws of physics,
> such as the conservation of energy (which means I need to find an energy
> source for input that is greater than I need in the form of
electricity).
>

In the future what ever you buy will run off of this.

Most electronic items (domestic) in the form of 110/220 actually use dc 
voltage. your pc under 12v DC.  AC is only needed for the transmission of 
power over great distances.

>
> | With that said and should be understood that is under normal operating
> | conditions. There is a inital startup that would have to be from an 
> outside
> | source.
>
> Sounds like an energy storage system with no way to extract.
>
>
> |> I'm assuming the output of energy is electrical (a useful form), or
one
> |> that
> |> could easily be converted to electrical.  If you can produce 100
watts 
> of
> |> power continuously, how many joules per seconds of energy input is
this
> |> device getting?
> |
> |
> | Again no input or output.
>
> So how is it useful if I can get no energy out of it?
>

"in short the electrical aperatus you are powering is induced into
 the system and becomes a part of the closed system. Maintaining system
 integrity."


>
> | Prepairing for the multitude of potential risks is more my worry.
proper
> | facilities are a must.
> | When things go wrong they go horribly wrong post haste. think for a 
> minute
> | were toying with a frictionless mechanism that has the potential to
meet 
> or
> | exceed any frequency of change we are aware of and probably many we 
> don't
> | know of or have benchmarked per say. Design variations may bring us to

> this
> | point but for now it is not designed to approach a harmful range.
>
> I don't see how this can be frictionless.  Even magnetic levitation has 
> some
> drag (though less than a wheel).
>

I have even eliminated drag coefficient from within the mechanism. It is 
frictionless.
mag-lev drag? Explain please?

>
> |> | If you want to experiment with the following technology feel free
to.
> |> Just
> |> | don't forget who you got it from, I want proper noteriety and a
copy 
> of
> |> your
> |> | works. It would be in err to assume that your going to manufacture
> |> without
> |> | my express knowledge and cooperation.  I feel it is safer at this 
> point
> |> as a
> |> | multipart construction.
> |> | http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!mechtrinket2.jpg
> |>
> |> You have a patent, or have applied for one?
> |>
> |> Why do you put ! characters in URLs or file names?  Strange.
> |
> | Not so strange. just a personal thing i do on occation. when
considering 
> the
> | thousands of images one creates or use on websites it is simpler than 
> coding
> | or decoding something like this 7r90t21j65.jpg on a consistant basis 
> when
> | editing websites. It is also an indicator that the person viewing the
> | spacific range of images is a person of interest through website 
> statistics.
>
> So what if you just left out the ! part and had:
>
> http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/mechtrinket2.jpg
>
> The reason I ask is that ! is a but more ***bersome for me.  The way I
> collect and archive URLs manually is affected by the ! character because
> in the path I apply the strings I save, the ! has a special meaning.  I
> then need to manually insert the character \ ahead of the ! to force it
> to bypass that special meaning.

Sorry I cannot change or rename existing files for reasons of
verification.
However i will take that into consideration when naming files in the
future.
Thank you for contacting the terrylhewettsr website webmaster with your 
suggestion.


>
>
> | I sent out hundreds of emails with the images and text pertaining to 
> this
> | and other technology of mine. it is a way of seeing if they actually 
> viewed
> | the images or just discarded the email.
>
> How does the ! part apply to that?
>

The ! put's the file higher on the listed website statistics. Saves a
great 
deal of time searching through hundreds of visitors. I make it a point of 
knowing who is viewing my technology and where they are from. This is the 
information age and as far as my technology goes I'm well informed.


>
> |> Maybe you can explain what it really does.
> |
> | In short sustain the dipole of the storage mechanism.
>
> So it is an energy storage system?

The battery bank is the storage mechanism to which i was refering to as a 
dipole. the multipole belt magnetic field arrangement is also a dipole but

in this application it is not the storage mechanism.

>
>
> |> |> Then construct it in isolation that prevents
> |> |> access to any other material or parts (if you want to hide from me

> how
> |> it
> |> |> is
> |> |> built).
> |> |
> |> | I'm not bieng carr here in any way. it should be pretty apparent
what
> |> | materials and parts are used.
> |>
> |> Huh?  I can't figure out much from the web site and photos and 
> drawings.
> |>
> |> For example, for all magnets, you should show the field orientation
of 
> the
> |> magnets in a drawing, or added to a photo.
> |>
> |
> | Ok i need a key on some images and my communication skills are fairly
> | minimal. It would be much easier if i was of academia or if i could 
> express
> | it in mathematical terms. However that is not the case. I'm a 
> unaccredited
> | benchtop inventor who's invention has drawn me into the very heart of
> | natural physics. Seemingly challenging science physics on several 
> levels.
> | That's not to say that my own understanding hasn't been challenged
over 
> the
> | course of a decade or two.
>
> I think you and I are in about the same boat, but just pursuing rather
> different ideas (and goals).
>
>
> | I allready told you it works. What's more im****tant, that mankind 
> understand
> | the very basis of natural physics, or terry selfishly worry about
lining 
> his
> | pockets with cash? However don't assume i havn't took measures to 
> protect my
> | interests.
>
> Well, I don't understand it.

Don't feel alone. I have been researching it for nearly 2 decades.
allthough 
i have everything about the mechanism and it's link to natural physics at 
the core level pretty well versed. there is such a broadband of 
entanglements with every action and resulting reaction that it is hard to 
describe or answer one question without bringing to attention a few other 
related entanglements. it tends to confuse the issue.

>
> If you can get someone to hand over money for it, that's your business.
>

That's also the business of a scam.

>
> | In all realities i never had money, i don't have money and it is
likely 
> i
> | will never have money.
> | I will probably die two weeks before my technology is realized. Adding

> my
> | name to the list of dead inventors that never lived to see their 
> greatness.
> | Effectively robbing mankind of the oppertunity of any real
understanding 
> of
> | the concept through the inventors eyes. Why should i be any different?

> hell
> | einstien gave several lectures on e=mc2 and it still isn't fully 
> understood.
> | there are volumes of text on gravity and we as a commonwealth of 
> knowledge
> | still don't have a clue.
>
> Maybe the understanding of it will be limited to your eyes.  I know I do

> not
> understand it.
>

Well you show an ernest need to gain understanding and that is the basis
to 
understanding anything.

>
> | The truth is that natural physics closely guards it's secrets by non
> | disclosure. If we want to know those secrets we have to discover them.

> In
> | many cases we have discovered some key bits of information and
academia 
> has
> | did a wonderful job of catagorizing them into se****ate fields of
study. 
> That
> | is a err natural physics would be better understood if academia 
> recognized
> | that natural physics encomp***** everything in the universe and each
is
> | relevant to each other equally.
>
> Grand unified theory of everything?
>
> -- 

Super relativity