Re: is the magnetic field really moving?

On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:56:18 -0500 Terry L Hewett Sr
<terrylhewettsr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

|> If there is no output of electricity, what good is it for me?  I'm
looking
|> for ways to generate electricity.  I expect to obey the laws of
physics,
|> such as the conservation of energy (which means I need to find an
energy
|> source for input that is greater than I need in the form of
electricity).
|>
| 
| In the future what ever you buy will run off of this.

Then it has to have output of power.  You said it had no input or output.


| Most electronic items (domestic) in the form of 110/220 actually use dc 
| voltage. your pc under 12v DC.  AC is only needed for the transmission
of 
| power over great distances.

And your device eliminates the need to transmit power over great
distances?


|> So how is it useful if I can get no energy out of it?
|>
| 
| "in short the electrical aperatus you are powering is induced into
| the system and becomes a part of the closed system. Maintaining system
| integrity."

And what does that mean?


|> | Prepairing for the multitude of potential risks is more my worry.
proper
|> | facilities are a must.
|> | When things go wrong they go horribly wrong post haste. think for a 
|> minute
|> | were toying with a frictionless mechanism that has the potential to
meet 
|> or
|> | exceed any frequency of change we are aware of and probably many we 
|> don't
|> | know of or have benchmarked per say. Design variations may bring us
to 
|> this
|> | point but for now it is not designed to approach a harmful range.
|>
|> I don't see how this can be frictionless.  Even magnetic levitation has

|> some
|> drag (though less than a wheel).
|>
| 
| I have even eliminated drag coefficient from within the mechanism. It is

| frictionless.
| mag-lev drag? Explain please?

Maglev is low drag, not zero drag.  Even if operated in a vacuum, it would
eventually slow down a ballistic (no continuing drive power) object.


|> The reason I ask is that ! is a but more ***bersome for me.  The way I
|> collect and archive URLs manually is affected by the ! character
because
|> in the path I apply the strings I save, the ! has a special meaning.  I
|> then need to manually insert the character \ ahead of the ! to force it
|> to bypass that special meaning.
| 
| Sorry I cannot change or rename existing files for reasons of
verification.
| However i will take that into consideration when naming files in the
future.
| Thank you for contacting the terrylhewettsr website webmaster with your 
| suggestion.

I just thought it was funny to want to add the ! in the names.  I was just
wondering if you had some reason for that, such as it being a mechanism
for
your web server software to bypass some script logic or something.


|> | I sent out hundreds of emails with the images and text pertaining to 
|> this
|> | and other technology of mine. it is a way of seeing if they actually 
|> viewed
|> | the images or just discarded the email.
|>
|> How does the ! part apply to that?
|>
| 
| The ! put's the file higher on the listed website statistics. Saves a
great 
| deal of time searching through hundreds of visitors. I make it a point
of 
| knowing who is viewing my technology and where they are from. This is
the 
| information age and as far as my technology goes I'm well informed.

So you want certain files to show up ahead of other files on your own
internal statistic/log re****ts.  OK.  Now I know.


|> |> Maybe you can explain what it really does.
|> |
|> | In short sustain the dipole of the storage mechanism.
|>
|> So it is an energy storage system?
| 
| The battery bank is the storage mechanism to which i was refering to as
a 
| dipole. the multipole belt magnetic field arrangement is also a dipole
but 
| in this application it is not the storage mechanism.

I'm asking about the device as a whole.


|> Well, I don't understand it.
| 
| Don't feel alone. I have been researching it for nearly 2 decades.
allthough 
| i have everything about the mechanism and it's link to natural physics
at 
| the core level pretty well versed. there is such a broadband of 
| entanglements with every action and resulting reaction that it is hard
to 
| describe or answer one question without bringing to attention a few
other 
| related entanglements. it tends to confuse the issue.

I might be able to understand it if every part were shown clearly in its
exact position.  One thing I also need to know is for any magnets, what
the exact magnetic orientation is.  I would also need to know which parts
are rigidly attached to others, and which are moveable relative to others.
Your illustrations managed to show a small fraction of any of this.


|> If you can get someone to hand over money for it, that's your business.
|>
| 
| That's also the business of a scam.

If you have something that works, and I mean really works and this can
be proven, you can get money.  That's not a scam.  Scammers specialize
in getting money from people who are not diligent enough to want proof.

I also know if power comes out, power has to go in from somewhere in no
less an amount.  If I get 1000 joules out over some time frame, there
had to be 1000 joules go in over some time frame that does not have to
be the same time frame as the output (note that some of the output can
be heat I don't always want).


| Well you show an ernest need to gain understanding and that is the basis
to 
| understanding anything.

Yes.

-- 
|WARNING: Due to extreme spam, googlegroups.com is blocked.  Due to
ignorance |
|         by the abuse department, bellsouth.net is blocked.  If you post
to  |
|         Usenet from these places, find another Usenet provider ASAP.    
   |
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (email for humans: first name in lower case at
ipal.net) |