Re: is the magnetic field really moving?

"Don Kelly" <dhky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:Isotk.125504$nD.20838@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ----------------------------
> "Terry L Hewett Sr" <terrylhewettsr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:g947o4$fll$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> The mechanism produces excess of what it uses to maintain rotation of
the 
>> toroid armature.
> -------------
> !!!!!!!!
> --------
>
>> Via design variations this excess can be a little or alot. the primary 
>> and secondary processes/ transformations are absolute. they are their
own 
>> entity within the process you cannot change them. However the excess is

>> real time and continous. look at it as an output if you must but the 
>> device your wanting to power will be inducted into the closed system.
the 
>> systems process will be indifferent to the addition of the extra
device.
>
> ------
> So:  It pur****tedly can run itself but produce excess energy to run 
> something else as well.
>
> Wiping away the plethora of rather meaningless combinations of words-
you 
> have essentially claimed that it is an overunity device aka perpetual 
> motion machine.
> -- 

Oh sorry don did i forget to claim that it is also a anti gravity
mechanism 
i must be slipping. LOL! Now i don't believe that free energy exists but 
that claim could also be derived from my explanations.

don your just going to have to come to grips that my mechanism is indeed a

free energy, anti-gravity, overunity, and perpetual motion machine all 
combined into one simple mechanism. Truth is I havn't even began to
explain 
it yet. Fact is that there is nothing in the natural universe that isn't 
implicated. NOTHING! Not even time it's self.

Do keep in mind that none of that was planned. I simply set out to find a 
way of driving  changing magnetic flux fields/lines through induction
coils 
cyclic. All the other by-products are a perk of doing such.