Re: is the magnetic field really moving?

----------------------------
"Terry L Hewett Sr" <terrylhewettsr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:g96i2l$iu4$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Don Kelly" <dhky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:Isotk.125504$nD.20838@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------
>> "Terry L Hewett Sr" <terrylhewettsr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:g947o4$fll$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>> The mechanism produces excess of what it uses to maintain rotation of 
>>> the toroid armature.
>> -------------
>> !!!!!!!!
>> --------
>>
>>> Via design variations this excess can be a little or alot. the primary

>>> and secondary processes/ transformations are absolute. they are their 
>>> own entity within the process you cannot change them. However the
excess 
>>> is real time and continous. look at it as an output if you must but
the 
>>> device your wanting to power will be inducted into the closed system. 
>>> the systems process will be indifferent to the addition of the extra 
>>> device.
>>
>> ------
>> So:  It pur****tedly can run itself but produce excess energy to run 
>> something else as well.
>>
>> Wiping away the plethora of rather meaningless combinations of words-
you 
>> have essentially claimed that it is an overunity device aka perpetual 
>> motion machine.
>> -- 
>
> Oh sorry don did i forget to claim that it is also a anti gravity 
> mechanism i must be slipping. LOL! Now i don't believe that free energy 
> exists but that claim could also be derived from my explanations.
------
Definitely so
------
>
> don your just going to have to come to grips that my mechanism is indeed
a 
> free energy, anti-gravity, overunity, and perpetual motion machine all 
> combined into one simple mechanism. Truth is I havn't even began to 
> explain it yet. Fact is that there is nothing in the natural universe
that 
> isn't implicated. NOTHING! Not even time it's self.
-------
There is one thing that you have left out- the compost heap where this
idea 
should reach its natural end.
-----
>
> Do keep in mind that none of that was planned. I simply set out to find
a 
> way of driving  changing magnetic flux fields/lines through induction 
> coils cyclic. All the other by-products are a perk of doing such.
-----------
Gee- you have reinvented the electric generator (admittedly in a more 
complicated and less effective method that we now have. All the other 
products are a figment of your imagination.

"Superconducting Rotory Toroidal Transformer (SRTT)"
The name catagorizes it appropreately.

Not superconducting (does it have an appropriate refridgerator powered
from 
some unspecified source) , probably not even a transformer unless you are 
getting honking big coil mmfs to overcome the magnets and in that case,
the 
magnets will cease to be effective as magnets ( Permanent magnet material
is 
about the worst choice one can make for  a transformer -consider the B-H 
curve to see why). As for rotation- consider all the forces -source as
well 
as drive coils-force directions as well as total net driving force (or are

you driving it from some underunity motor supplied from your mageticallty 
inefficient coil/core system?)

So all I see is a toroid made with permanent magnets and spacers with
coils 
at intervals, which somehow is rotating (no workable mechanism indicated) 
and somehow will do more than produce weak voltage pulses which somehow
can 
produce  currents to pulse other coils to produce forces which are in the 
correct direction (questionable but even if true  there will be opposing 
forces in the source coil).

You are free to postulate a "new Physics" but, to be considered, it must
fit 
the observed phenomena. What you have proposed doesn't do that.  It is
hand 
waving, pure and simple.

  I'm not waiting impatiently for a testable working model. However,
thanks 
for the amusement on a rainy evening.
-- 

Don Kelly dhky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 the X to answer

>
>
>