plutonium.archime...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> What this Experiment is designed to do is show what Superconductivity
> is really all about,
> and it is all about Capacitors. When a Capacitor charges up and then
> discharges, the current
> it produces is a superconductor current. The reason mercury at 4
> Kelvin is superconductive is
> because at that temperature mercury atoms become arranged to be a
> capacitor.
> So when you have electric current of DC flowing into a capacitor such
> as mercury at 4 Kelvin
> the mercury atoms build up a current and in nanoseconds discharge that
> current. So superconductivity
> is simply a Capacitor Current.
> Before in physics, we had only two types of currents-- AC and DC.
> Nowadays, with this experiment
> we obviously have more than two types of currents in the world. We
> have a Capacitor Current.
> Lightning bolt strikes are a Capacitor Current. I call capacitor
> currents as CC.
> How does Capacitor Currents explain (i) zero resistance and (ii)
> Meissner Effect? Easy answers to
> both. The zero resistance is simply the fact of Conservation of
> Energy. That energy in is equal to
> energy out. The Meissner Effect is also easy to explain as ideal-
> diamagnetism of a exclusion of
> magnetic field. As in the above uncharged VandeGraaff and uncharged
> Wimshurst repell the magnetic
> coil.
> My old Freshman Physics textbook by Halliday and Resnick, 3rd edition
> 1988 defines electric current
> and where AC and DC are within the bounds of that definition. However,
> that definition of current in
> physics is outdated. The new definition of current in physics needs to
> be expanded so that it includes
> this third type of current called Capacitor Current, or CC. So physics
> has DC, and AC, and CC
> The experiment I am performing for these past year has all been posted
> to the Internet sci newsgroups
> and can easily be performed by others to confirm the truth of the
> particulars.
I repeated the experiment again tonight using more refined setup of
glass containers
to hold the electrodes in place and elevate for the VandeGraaff. Also
had a better
measurement on the magnetic repulsion.
I confirm what I wrote in 5 August
Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.physics.electromag, sci.chem
From: plutonium.archime...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tue, 5 Aug 2008 01:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Aug 5 2008 3:26 am
Subject: #130 resuming experiments with both VandeGraaf and Wimshurst;
attained a Meissner Effect ; new textbook: "How Superconductivity
really works; nanosecond Capacitor discharge current"
The above thread is #130 through #150 of this book.
I use both a Wimshurst and a Van de Graaff generators. I like both of
them.
I have metal coil lathe shavings of iron and magnetized several and
tied a dental-floss string to one
which was magnetized over a month. Tested its "slight magnetism"
with an unmagnetized shaving.
The weight of this shaving with string was so small that my scale of
1/10 gram could not weigh it.
So will have to build a balancing beam capable of measuring the weight
of the iron shaving.
The length of the iron shaving is approx 3.5 cm. and its diameter
approx 0.7 cm.
Operated both the Wimshurst and VandeGraaf and then placed a compass-
needle at the north-pole of
the electrode (largest electrode on VandeGraaf) and again noticed the
deflection of the needle 90 degrees.
Operated both machines again to fill capacitors. Now while in
operation, hung the iron-shaving attached
to the dental-floss at the north-pole of the large electrode on the
VandeGraaf and as expected it
acted as a ideal-diamagnet or the Meissner Effect. However, the iron
shaving at the equator of the
VandeGraaf was attracted as well as my hair on my arms was attracted.
As for the Wimshurst, at the pole of either of the electrodes the
Meissner effect occurred.
And finally on the northpole of the capacitors of the Wimshurst
displayed a Meissner Effect
on the iron-shaving.
So here again, in late August a repeating of my experimentation in
March of
2008, that I again achieve
a Meissner Effect from Capacitor-Current of both VandeGraaff and
Wimshurst generators.
I challenge anyone to duplicate the results.
P.S. this is not Lenz's law as one mistaken responder opined, for he
could have said that
all Meissner tests are Lenz's law under such a mistake.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
|
