Re: is the magnetic field really moving?

"Don Kelly" <dhky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:KVKtk.51211$hx.6112@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>> don your just going to have to come to grips that my mechanism is
indeed 
>> a free energy, anti-gravity, overunity, and perpetual motion machine
all 
>> combined into one simple mechanism. Truth is I havn't even began to 
>> explain it yet. Fact is that there is nothing in the natural universe 
>> that isn't implicated. NOTHING! Not even time it's self.
> -------
> There is one thing that you have left out- the compost heap where this 
> idea should reach its natural end.


Don the compost heap is also a transformation of energy. Do i need to 
explain or can you figure that one out for yourself?



> -----
>>
>> Do keep in mind that none of that was planned. I simply set out to find
a 
>> way of driving  changing magnetic flux fields/lines through induction 
>> coils cyclic. All the other by-products are a perk of doing such.
> -----------
> Gee- you have reinvented the electric generator (admittedly in a more 
> complicated and less effective method that we now have. All the other 
> products are a figment of your imagination.
>
> "Superconducting Rotory Toroidal Transformer (SRTT)"
> The name catagorizes it appropreately.
>
> Not superconducting (does it have an appropriate refridgerator powered 
> from some unspecified source)

Don do you know how a fridge works? here let me give you a little run
down. 
HFC-134a, is compressed and then forced to expand. effectively going from
a 
liquid state to a gas. I'm essentially doing this with the permanent 
magnetic fields within the drive coils. No mass is compressed just the 
fields are compressed and upon exiting the drive coils the permanent 
magnetic fields will return to their original state. this manipulation of 
the fields within the mass is what supercools the mass drawing heat from
it 
as the fridge draws heat from the compartment.

ever seen those 12vdc coolers that cool and or warm. well they are 
essentially the same process with the exception that they use circuitry 
rather than a gas.

There is your unspecified source?



, probably not even a transformer unless you are
> getting honking big coil mmfs to overcome the magnets and in that case, 
> the magnets will cease to be effective as magnets ( Permanent magnet 
> material is about the worst choice one can make for  a 
> transformer -consider the B-H curve to see why). As for rotation-
consider 
> all the forces -source as well as drive coils-force directions as well
as 
> total net driving force (or are you driving it from some underunity
motor 
> supplied from your mageticallty inefficient coil/core system?)

If it transforms energy it is a transformer and that includes our bodies.
so 
there doesn't need to be the conditions of "honking big coil mmfs". So it
is 
quite clear that you and much of the rest of the sciences need to
reevaluate 
transformation of energy and what classifies as a transformer. Your
opinion 
of a permanent magnetic field bieng "the worst choice" is shared among the

scientific community and would be inaccurate. the drive sections are not 
under or over unity they are the same as common electric motors other than

the difference of configuration of the field interractions. the means of 
transforming elec to kinetic makes every elec motor on the planet a 
transformer.


>
> So all I see is a toroid made with permanent magnets and spacers with 
> coils at intervals, which somehow is rotating (no workable mechanism 
> indicated) and somehow will do more than produce weak voltage pulses
which 
> somehow can produce  currents to pulse other coils to produce forces
which 
> are in the correct direction (questionable but even if true  there will
be 
> opposing forces in the source coil).

think of the first transformation
as a 1 to 1 ratio. the DC voltage is totally used in the transformation to
kinetic. the kinetic energy produced is used for the work however the work
is to drive the multiple permanent magnetic field arrangemt of the toroid
armature through the 4 induction coils inducing voltage. The toroid
armature
has multiple segments. this final transformation has a potential of a
extreme ratio via design variation. ok say you have 50 segments (flux
fields/lines) on the toroid armature. say we only use 1 induction coil and
only one revolution is considered. that's a 50 to 1 ratio. 50 segments 4
induction coils is a 200 to 1 ratio one revolution. Take into
consideration
the frictionless environment and the potential for hyper extreme
revolutions
per minute. continuing with that logic 50 segments 4 induction coils and
at
100,000rpm is a 20,000,000 to 1 ratio. 20 million times a minute that a
voltage is induced without interuption. now that's faradays principle of
induction run amuk.


>
> You are free to postulate a "new Physics" but, to be considered, it must

> fit the observed phenomena. What you have proposed doesn't do that.  It
is 
> hand waving, pure and simple.

Well Don if it fit known "observed phenomena" it wouldn't be "new physics"

now would it?