Re: is the magnetic field really moving?

"Don Kelly" <dhky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:Dl2vk.243605$gc5.190048@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ----------------------------
> "Terry L Hewett Sr" <terrylhewettsr@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:g9heho$8s1$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "Don Kelly" <dhky@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:IiMuk.138522$nD.3978@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> I am no less than a mechanical genius. you will fare well to understand

>> that. If I publish that i have discovered a simplified process to 
>> supercool a permanent magnet than that's what we have. Again If i
publish 
>> i have in effect discovered the process to compress or manipulate the 
>> permanent magnetic field in such a way that it essentially is
compressed 
>> than allowed to expand that is what we have. If I go furthur and state 
>> that the mechanical process actually mirrors the refridgeration and 
>> airconditioning process than it should be considered as absolute.
>>
>> In case you don't understand don and it is apparent that you don't 
>> understand. the physics that you cherish and hold dearly is mearly mans

>> interpretation of a mechanical or series of mechanical events observed
to 
>> date. in short your understanding of physics is limited to others 
>> observations of a mechanical process. My understanding on the other
hand 
>> is based on the observations of the mechanism as a whole. My level of 
>> understanding in the field of physics is at the core level. I fully 
>> understand what is going on in the universe and how these things come 
>> about. can you make that claim don? If not? Why not?
> -----------------------------------
> I can't make that claim for 2 reasons:
> a)I know enough to know the limits of my knowledge.
> b) I am not God.

a) There is no such limits to knowledge. Only the ones we set
individually.
b) You don't have to be god.

You are free to seek knowledge unabated. We are in the information age and

your obviously connected. It is ok to question my claims and seek answers 
elsewhere. It's ok to confront me with your findings.



>
> Not only BS and hand waving but an elevated sense of one's own 
> superiority. Dear "God", please forgive a mere mortal for daring to 
> question your pronouncements (even if you haven't deigned to provide any

> back up for your statements).
>
> So, "God", it appears that now you have changed me from "agnosticism" to

> "athiesm" as I don't believe your nonsense.
>
> Bye
> -- 

Put up or shut up don! Answer my questions!

Really don what makes you think that i would publish so adamantly a bunch
of
unverifiable bs? Are my claims easily dismissed given reasonable
consideration? Would my claims in terms of *seeming as a violation* cover
a
small band of overall physics or a broad band of overall physics? Are the
violations few or many? In the event that i am 100% correct in my claims
would it effect physics as it is understood mildly or radically? Could
academia benifit from a higher level of understanding of overall physics?
Would key laws be involved such as conservation of energy? Are just a few
known principles conflicting with my claims or many?  I'm just saying that
there are many pieces to the puzzle of natural physics. In terms of
understanding or a commonwealth of knowledge we are as infants. we only
have
the borders defined. the bulk of the puzzle is vastly unknown. We lack the
key to the puzzle.

Here i represent that very key and don kelly dismisses it as BS and hand
waving; BAH!